This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Thank you for the evaluation. My internet is slow so I can't comment there regarding your question about vaporization but I can reply here.
To answer your question regarding about using vaporization. In Danny Phantom ectoplasmic energy blasts such as the Ghost Ray (which caused that destruction) vaporize objects, we've seen it and burn characters and objects and Danny stated we was gonna turn Undergrowth into ashes when he charged an energy blast. Many other weapons in the verse are stated to be capable of vaporizing people and objects so it's consistent in verse.
... Turning something into ashes isn't vaporizing. It's in fact explicitly not vaporizing. Just burning something also isn't enough to be considered vaporization. And why does it matter that other weapons can do it?
I thought heat can vaporize objects? It's the extreme heat from the ectoplasmic attacks that burn/turn objects to ash and vaporize. The steam from the crater we see also comes of the characters when struck by said attacks and other weapons in the verse have the exact same effect and are stated to vaporize so it's how the verse shows us that they can do it.
Heat can vaporize objects but like, if it's turning them to ashes that means they aren't vaporized, since there's still ashes left. Anyway I don't really care for Danny Phantom so if other calc members have accepted it I won't get in the way, but I still think it's wrong.
If it's wrong to use vaporization then it's wrong regardless of if the math is correct. I'll simply need to get the feats recalculated using pulverization, thanks for the feedback.
Thank you for being understanding. I don't think vaporization is TOO unbelievable here but when it's unsure I'd personally prefer pulverization since vaporization makes feats hundreds of times higher.
Hey, I created a thread downgrading the verse but since vaporization has come into question I was wondering if you'd be interested in re-calculating the two feats using pulverization of soil for a safer calc.
We have a value for the destruction of soil, but it's really low, to the point I kinda believe it might be wrong sometimes. However I'm not an expert on materials, if you wanna get the components checked maybe KLOL could help. As they are, both feats are 9-A, I can make a blog if you want but idk if those results are useful.
Whenever you get the chance a blog would be fine yes, and 9-A results are helpful since we don't have any solid feats to scale them from at this time. It would be a safety net for the characters at minimum.
To answer your question regarding about using vaporization. In Danny Phantom ectoplasmic energy blasts such as the Ghost Ray (which caused that destruction) vaporize objects, we've seen it and burn characters and objects and Danny stated we was gonna turn Undergrowth into ashes when he charged an energy blast. Many other weapons in the verse are stated to be capable of vaporizing people and objects so it's consistent in verse.