I want to tell you outright that I'm going to reject that. I'll write up the actual response later since I'd like to do the math myself, but we can easily determine the actual on screen speed of the thing based on its movement compared to Jupiter. We don't need to assume arbitrary time-frames.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
VS Battles Wiki Forum
Accelerated_Evolution
Take your time!
As long as it's possible to find an accurate speed value, i'm fine
As long as it's possible to find an accurate speed value, i'm fine
Mr. Bambu
Mhmm. If I can remember, when I'm home from work I'll do it.
Accelerated_Evolution
Bump?
Accelerated_Evolution
Given the recent discussion regarding the correct timing to be used and me personally don't 100% agreeing with your logic, do you think it would be fine to create a Calc Group Discussion regarding which timing would be more accurate? Or should this be handled on a normal CRT?
Mr. Bambu
If you want, you can create one. I think it would fall more into CGM territory.
That said, I'm curious what you mean by my logic. My logic is to look at the screen and note the speed.
That said, I'm curious what you mean by my logic. My logic is to look at the screen and note the speed.
Accelerated_Evolution
I expressed myself badly
What i meant is: Your logic is fine calc-wise, my problem is that such timeframe doesn't seems to be pratical given that the sword would take half a hour to go from Jupiter to Earth, despite the in-show context needing it to cross the distance in way faster speeds
What i meant is: Your logic is fine calc-wise, my problem is that such timeframe doesn't seems to be pratical given that the sword would take half a hour to go from Jupiter to Earth, despite the in-show context needing it to cross the distance in way faster speeds
Mr. Bambu
I see. I would just clock that up to it being a cartoon and not taking that sort of thing seriously, really- if I were a writer, I'd just say the planets are actually closer together. We can see one thing (the speed), we don't know the other.
Still. You're free to your thread, of course. I can ping some CGMs on it if you'd like.
Still. You're free to your thread, of course. I can ping some CGMs on it if you'd like.
Accelerated_Evolution
I will try to make the thread to get more opinions on the timeframe then (Probably on the next week given my current lack of time)
Btw, since the calc also included a High 4-C feat for the Sword destroying Jupiter, might you given your thoughts on which end should be used?
Btw, since the calc also included a High 4-C feat for the Sword destroying Jupiter, might you given your thoughts on which end should be used?
Mr. Bambu
I'll speak on that later but I have grounds to nitpick that too.
Accelerated_Evolution
Still waiting your response to the High 4-C calc btw
Might answer his comment when you have the proper time to do so?