"He could do that," but he has no reason to do so. I pointed out in the discussion that he is not motivated to do so, since destroying a building will not lead to anything like defeating Frisk. Dust Sans only destroys boxes and stores that will really hinder Frisk. In any case, you don't seem to be following our discussions, but I'll let you know.
Like I said many, many, many... many... times before, Calva has NEVER said he could break down large buildings like skyscrapers if he had the motivation. She has only ever said he simply does not want to. This implies NOTHING about his capability to do it or not, hence why we can't baselessly assume that he can.
Then we need contexts that contradict what Calv said, for example, where Calv's contexts contradict what he said, where his answer does not correspond to previous answers, to prove this, similar arguments are necessary. Usually, Calv does not contradict his own words in his answers, but if there are, then you can show or at least take the answers from the Ask team. In any case, this is a discussion, and we strictly take into account every contradiction and feat.
This is absolutely absurd. Just because Calva said that Murder could do something but had no reason to in one statement does not mean it applies to every other ask. Calva did not specify that was a "rule of thumb" or anything, nor did she say he is capable of doing such a thing in the ask at hand. Such logic is an outlandish highball.
The context should be completely different, for example, Dust should lack the context that even if he is interested in this, he is completely unable to do it. And yes, regarding the confusion of canonicity, I don’t really remember such a context from Kalva, but here it is more likely connected with the ASK team and not Kalv himself, although what canonicity is there if Ask follows the canon of fantasy
It is completely different. What Calva said in both asks does not mean the same thing. If she meant Murder would be able to break down large buildings, she would have said it, like she did in the other ask. If anything, this just proves he isn't able to do it.
He never said he was limited to this level. In any case, as I said, you need more compelling evidence, since you are currently unable to prove anything. Your context is not suitable for such a debunking. To prove something like this, contradictions are needed. If you continue to prove something like this without evidence, but it seems that you are incapable of analyzing the context. I advise you to start with literature and understand what the authors want to convey. This helps develop a strong understanding of written language and helps better recognize the author's conjecture.
I don't appreciate the condescending tone here. I've already given multiple reasons as to why your logic here doesn't work and you've yet to provide any arguments against them (other than what comes off as an insult). This isn't the proper way to get things done here.
Is this a condescending tone? This is just a regular conversation about how to increase intelligence. Where's the condescending tone here? It's about the amazing brain and its many functions, even having a gyrus that understands written words. In any case, what you call "presenting many arguments" doesn't even have that context from Kalva, I already mentioned it. There must be contradictions, not just a joke.
You may not be a native English speaker, but that type of tone often comes off as very rude and insulting. Anyways, as I've already said, it's completely illogical to apply one statement's logic to another, especially when they don't say the same thing. You would need to prove that's what Calva meant, as the two asks do not say the same thing regarding Sans's capability to perform the action.
Can you send me this context where Kalv talks about this?
I thought there was something serious going on here, but didn't I mention "we don't know the ASK team, so I'm only taking context from Kalv?" Kalv has long since lost contact with them. In fact, yes, he is the author, but at the same time, he doesn't want to admit it. Basically, all his answers, "think as you want," as well as "any traps," give details of a fan's fantasies. Although, considering that Kalv no longer has a connection with the ASK team, he can recognize his novel as canon, but it seems the author himself still thinks that he is a fan.
Calva does not want to make their own, personal ideas about Murder into canon because she's not the sole author of Murder (in fact, I'm pretty sure she wasn't even there for his creation). This is only prove even further (beyond basic common sense) that applying one statement's logic to another is a bad idea due to how inconsistent Calva is.
The "blitz" doesn't exist. That ask in of itself is literally an offguard, which fits with the statements of Murder trying to be as efficient as possible. The statement itself doesn't even imply a blitz occured. The Uni+ EE stuff isn't even EE nor does it correlate to Murder himself, it's just the game being erased because of the code being messed up now iirc.
I don't remember mentioning that Kalv is the creator of Dusttail, I only mentioned that Kalv is a member, but in any case, the Ask team lost contact with Kalva. Honestly, I thought that the Ask team existed, but thanks to your scans, I didn't even know that Kalv had already lost contact, that is, the Ask team broke up and has long been out of contact with Dusttale and even Kalva himself.
Calva admits she's the author of the novels and also is a "creator" of Dusttale, they even have it on their Twitter. However, Calva doesn't recognize any of their stuff as canon because Dusttale has always been and she thinks it should stay open to interpretation to the fans. It literally says it IN THE ORIGINAL POST and Calva is wanting to respect the original framework laid out already.
I knew this fact about concepts, but now I know that Calv is a full-fledged author of Dusttale. Before, I thought he was still a participant.
You can just read all the posts here and maybe then you will understand the meaning of his intelligence or his similar level. In any case, Dust Sans will receive an absolute level downgrade
I agree. But we shouldn't go with what you're proposing.
