This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
y'know if they made the 10th season of the Office, Jim would transport Dwight coexist as a Mahlo-Cardinal-dimensioned plane of existence where he couldn't reach back to the Dunder-Mifflin Office in time and get a late receipt.
True story.
They wouldn't REMOTELY be banned for those durations were it not for offsite factors.
I think if you're making bullshit reports on other users motivated by your biases against their social status that is extremely problematic and damaging to the site, let alone a user's psyche, he actively...
I am an ex-staff who helped build the case and am bringing up relevant precedent on the matter at hand from what has been the happenings on the wiki itself, please re-examine your definition of useful and recognize a content moderator isn't relevant authority in thread matters
Also Bambu we are...
Y'all insist on the worst ******* takes sometimes. We've banned users for being a prick before, on Discord and the like, hell for folks like Dread and to an extent SeraEX, all of their problematic shit was on Discord and even recently we've banned people for vouching creepy pedo shit, all...
Can you fathom that the thread is approaching two years old with barely any input and you're tagging a user who has zero interest in helping a website that harbors and rewards bigots by putting them on shrines?
I believe you're able to gauge what I prefer you to do: close it and do not tag me...
and lo and behold, our filter already bans the use of one of the piracy sites that we are ever so willing to acknowledge as a "Authentic Source" by the proposed rule.
Follow the issue with the wording here?
Yes. Deagon's rule is worded poorly and the problem it's trying to tackle can be fixed easily another way.
Not intending the first one, do intending the second one. i am not against the core concept of the rule I despise the wording of it as it leads to unintended exclusion of verses and is...
A prominent unbiased commentator who gives an attestation on the existence of a media piece and has no skin in the game in doctoring a scan.
So say a well-respected archive (including grey-black area ones), those aren't official sources but it would be antithetical for them to doctor scans...
...this is unnecessarily paranoid. A reputable source isn't insular, it is quite the opposite, it is definite or popular.
VSBW really just loves to talk about shit you CAN'T do on it rather than shit it WANTS you to do huh
dmc bros don't give up, find another wiki loophole, you can do it. do it for humor's sake.
Also for the record this is a devastating concept for a significant portion of verses, unless you and the wiki literally have to acknowledge that yes, we are allowing piracy (you know, the illegal thing)...
There was no conclusion ever because there was no consensus ever, the thread is reliant on having definite standards on what to list common powers which weren't case-by-case issues, but it seems staff supposedly has other things to do rather than give definite answers.