• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Recent content by The_2nd_Existential_Seed

  1. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Disney Discussion Thread

    There is a lot of stuff from Wonderland Bakery about Aristollean Logic being ignored. So it is safe to say Wonderland operates beyond Aristollean / Classical Logic Also I agree with DimeUhDozen and some of Bobiscan's points. Kingdom Hearts isn't stably connected to Disney cosmology. Im not...
  2. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Kingdom Heart cosmology

    Hello everyone. Personally I can see KH being way higher than it currently is Tier Wise. I would need to have the time to go through the story again, however. I don't want to end up found lacking if I argue for something and then KH has an antifeat that shuts me down. ... As for the current...
  3. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Winx Club - General Discussion

    Hm. Alright then. I would be willing to help out.
  4. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Marvel's Comics' Magnificent Mystic Cosmology full of Marvelous Magic!

    I personally think the Celestials should vary in the first tier. The named Celestials are consistently regarded as Abstract level, while the random no named Celestials vary a lot, however even they still have 1-A showings and depictions at times. So I would say varying from Low 1-A to 1-A should...
  5. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Isekai at Peace Discussion Thread

    At the same time, they hypothetically explicitly assume the Epilogue would be affected for it to work, otherwise it wouldn't be considered contradictory by any stretch of the imagination. the R>F excuse doesn't really land when the hypothetically are explicitly assuming that the Epilogue is...
  6. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Isekai at Peace Discussion Thread

    Bump. ... It still genuinely sucks to me that the most obvious example of defying Logic (The Epilogue) is just crumbled up and treated as just reality-fiction transcendence when the current standards don't use that excuse. If reality-fiction transcendence allowed people to defied the laws of...
  7. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Clarifying the True Nature of The Source, The Presence, and The Overvoid (Tier 0 Proposal)

    I have a question, shouldn't The Avatar of the Presence / The Archangels / Elaine (after replacing the presence and after replacing Michael) directly scale to the Void. The most well known feat of the Archangels / Elaine (after she replaced the Presence) is that she, Mazikeen, and Lucifer...
  8. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Getbackers Discussion Thread

    This is a several year old bump, so i apologize, but wouldn't Get Backers probably qualify for Logic Manipulation ?
  9. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Honkai: Star Rail Discussion Thread

    https://honkai-impact-3rd-archives.fandom.com/wiki/Hundred_Years_of_Solitary_Shadow/Dialogue#Act_2_-_Persistent_Entanglement Here, specifically: Perception: I’m a tool of the Creator; hence, my capabilities should know no bounds, just like the power of those who, in the name of Shus, traversed...
  10. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Honkai: Star Rail Discussion Thread

    There are mentions of the Omnipotence Paradox stuff within Honkai Impact and that the creators of Perception just do not care about those kind of contradictions/paradoxes. However, I have NO IDEA where the likes of the Shus are in the scaling or if they are based on Honkai Energy... So I'll...
  11. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Isekai at Peace Discussion Thread

    I do think Epilogue absolutely qualifies though. Previously they didn't include defying deductive reasoning as a qualifier, now they do, and the Epilogue is textbook defying deductive reasoning.
  12. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Logic Manipulation Addition Thread

    Profile: Kim Dokja Verse: Omniscient Reader's Viewpoint. Key: "Ascending to Oldest Dream Key" Power on the Profile: Law Manipulation Basic Logic Broken: Non-Contradiction Reasoning: It explicitly allows for the existence for mutually exclusive events within the story. Evidence: As the dreamer of...
  13. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    The commoners thread: Discussing the Staff Threads concerning "Logic Manipulation" and the Changes to the Tiering System

    So this thread is to discuss discuss what's currently happening in the Tiering System, who you believe gets Logic Manipulation / Paraconsistency Physiology, and just talking about it because the main threads discussing this either explicitly say not to bloat the thread with discussion, or are...
  14. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    Maou Gakuin Discussion Thread

    As someone who is only seeing what's on the profile, Veneziara is a textbook logic manipulation (paradox / logical contradiction creation) based on the current definitions of such on the site. Making both possibilities true "being drawn and not being drawn" ... Genuinely makes me think there...
  15. The_2nd_Existential_Seed

    The Contradictions in the Current Tiering System Page.

    What I am trying to say is: - If a character is defined as beyond reason (as in the definition I gave for it, which encompasses both correct and incorrect reasoning) , then what do we do for it. Yes, correct reasoning is obviously dependent on following Logic, but incorrect reasoning isn't...
Back
Top