This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
It is not self-evident. A calculation replacement would require some discussion whether which calculation is more preferable and consistent with the narrative.
Then it is unknown. "Did nothing", but get an ability? If there is an implication that they restored their memory by manipulating something, then it is restoration or memory manipulation.
I'm starting to sense that you are deliberately attempting to misinterpret him. You've presented your defense; now, let other staff team members determine the course of action for you.
I fully support the proposed topic ban, and if it is approved, @Maverick_Zero_X should voluntarily close her own thread. In my view, whether it's a discussion rule or a topic ban, the essence is the same. However, a decisive action should be taken, as continually debating the same point or...
There is nothing new under the sun; all arguments, with recycled evidence, attempt to circumvent past rejections by masquerading as novel, despite the unchanged premise
I don't see the difference at all. I support the discussion rule.