• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Recent content by Anypersonburnimagines

  1. Anypersonburnimagines

    Naruto to Boruto Discussion Thread

    Wasn't it Itachi himself who said that in Part I? On the other hand, after the brothers' fight, Obito revealed to Sasuke that Itachi's goal in that battle was never to kill him, because if that had truly been his objective, Itachi would still be alive and Sasuke would be dead.
  2. Anypersonburnimagines

    Naruto to Boruto Discussion Thread

    Actually, if I remember correctly, doesn't Obito say that Sasuke only managed to break out of Itachi's Tsukuyomi because Itachi allowed him to?
  3. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    bump
  4. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    Except when the case is that such context was consciously removed in the anime adaptation. What I’m saying is that we can’t just assume it remains valid simply because the context still exists in the manga. You’re mixing two things. When I said that, I wasn’t stating as a fact that there was a...
  5. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    The problem with your argument is that it treats “keeping the manga relevant” and “keeping every specific statement from the manga automatically valid” as if they were the same thing — they are not. Agreeing that the manga shouldn't be discarded as a whole doesn't imply that every specific...
  6. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    The central point is that, without concrete evidence that the Hōgyoku context was merely omitted and not discarded, any claim to that effect is just as speculative as my interpretation that it was removed. Both readings are mutually plausible, but the simplest and safest interpretation, based on...
  7. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    This is a false dilemma. At no point am I claiming that Yhwach can only see what he directly perceives. The point is different: there is a fundamental distinction between access to information and the interpretation of that information. Yhwach can, indeed, see events he has not perceived...
  8. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    Got it. You didn’t get it. I’m not saying that the future changes according to perception — it’s quite clear that the future changes according to events. However, the way future possibilities are interpreted depends on how the present is perceived from the observer’s perspective. The central...
  9. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    Does the wiki accept Muken as its own dimension outside of the Soul Society? Even if the vision of the future is a mental image rather than a direct sensory stimulus, the mind that interprets that image still relies on sensory and cognitive references constructed from the perception of the...
  10. Anypersonburnimagines

    BAN-KAI! Bleach General Discussion

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs
  11. Anypersonburnimagines

    Another topic involving Aizen's affairs

    I’ve been reviewing Aizen’s profile and noticed a few points that, in my view, deserve reevaluation. Either because they are poorly contextualized or simply don’t accurately reflect what’s shown in the work. Below, I explain each one with the respective justifications: Cosmic Awareness This...
  12. Anypersonburnimagines

    (Bleach) MEMORIES OF NOBODY CANONICITY REMOVAL

    I disagree with this. Do you know the concept of the death of the author? And that’s exactly what’s happening here. Saying that Memories of Nobody isn’t canon just because Kubo said so years ago doesn’t hold up, when we literally see the events of a movie that he claimed to be a non-canon...
  13. Anypersonburnimagines

    [Bleach] Shinigami, except Ichibei does NOT have EE buddy 😭💔 (Thread accepted)

    No. The Zero Division isn’t part of the Soul Society — they exist outside it, in the Royal Palace, and are concerned only with the Reio, showing no interest in matters that don’t involve him, such as the situation with Aizen. If they truly wanted to get involved, they would have descended just...
  14. Anypersonburnimagines

    [Bleach] Shinigami, except Ichibei does NOT have EE buddy 😭💔 (Thread accepted)

    We shouldn’t assume that Mayuri was including Ichibē in the equation of possible executioners, because in his statement he clearly says that no form of execution within the Soul Society can stop the criminals’ hearts. Ichibē’s EE shouldn’t be considered simply because he isn’t a member of the...
  15. Anypersonburnimagines

    [Bleach] Shinigami, except Ichibei does NOT have EE buddy 😭💔 (Thread accepted)

    It’s not a matter of underestimating Aizen, but of not extrapolating beyond what the work actually shows. My opinion isn’t based on assumptions about intentions or future power comparisons, but on what can be confirmed: there’s no evidence that Mayuri included Ichibē’s EE in his analyses, nor...
See more
Back
Top