Only a couple sources affirm this. Even so, it doesn't inherently contradict anything -- nor does it somehow disregard about a hundred sources calling blasters lasers or light based.
Do you realistically think that I-Five's lasers are not blasterfire when they clearly called coherent light, the same description given to blasters? Or that blasters are somehow not under the scope of "energy weapons"? This seems like cherrypicking something that should be obvious and doesn't pose a immediate contradiction, rather than finding actual evidence against the claim. I do await some concrete evidence that it isn't aside from uncorroborated assertions based on word choices.
What do Jedi typically block, in fact, what does Form 3 typically block? Blasters. Not "exotic laser weapons". Why would the statement just be referring to some specialized weapon when the primary use of the form is blaster deflection.
I don't care about the BOP here. This is not a formal discussion. Nobody uses this colloquially.
You are grasping at straws. You have one anti-feat. I have plenty more supporting my claims.
Sources.