• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact AKM sama if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.

Your Least Favorite Ratings/Tiers

1,548
203
Have an AP, lifting strength, speed, etc. rating that you dislike for some reason? List them here and explain why.
For example:

Least favorite Tier/Attack Potency: Low 1-A. Just kinda confuses me. I understand 1-A and higher, but Low 1-A just kinda seems like something that should be baseline 1-A tbh, tho that would kinda mess up the tiering of high Tier 1 and Tier 0. I dunno.

Least favorite Lifting Strength: Unknown. Commonly used when Superhuman would be more appropriate, descriptive, and sound less lowball-y. See canon Dragon Ball.

Least favorite Speed: Massively FTL+. The gap between baseline and peak is absolutely massive, and all the speed ratings in between them make my brain hurt, especially the higher-end ones like you'd see from the fastest sub-Infinite comics and manga characters.
 
1,106
279
Low 2-C, it feels like basically every character who destroys/creates a universe just gets this tier even if there’s no definitive proof that all of time would be destroyed or the universe has a different space-time anyway

5-C, it’s basically the 5-B waiting room, any Feat that involves a moon at this point at least tries to be upgraded to Planet and frankly I’m surprised Planet Level tournament Roshi hasn’t happened yet
 
4,700
442
5-C sucks so badly. I can’t think of many characters in the tier and practically none of them line up with each other. Unfortunately one of my favorite characters is stuck in the tier and they are practically baseline which is the worst spot to be in tier 5-C (especially since they upscale from baseline so I can’t even put them against high end high 6-As)
 
7,881
1,192
Probably 6-C or High 6-C, maybe 5-C as well. They just.... don't sound right. Weirdly enough, my least favorite tier names mostly have C in it
 
1,106
279
“5-C is the level where you can destroy/create the moon!”

Someone calcs the Moon Feat and it comes out as 5-B even if it’s only a portion of the actual full moon

not saying it’s wrong, but it’s certainly humorous and a bit annoying
 
2,825
142
“5-C is the level where you can destroy/create the moon!”

Someone calcs the Moon Feat and it comes out as 5-B even if it’s only a portion of the actual full moon

not saying it’s wrong, but it’s certainly humorous and a bit annoying
didnt a character destroy like 1/4 of the moon and got 5-A?
 
4,700
442
Those are practically the size of the moon, so I’m not surprised it gets around the same results normally moving the moon does. Too be fair the reason moon feats are often so high is because moving the moon is actually a common trope. Since the moon is so big moving it any decent distance in comparison with itself often leads to cartoonish speeds. Which is why the results are always cartoonishly high.

Though the tier still is very barren and somewhat jarring due to most moon feats not getting moon level.
 
1,106
279
One day there’s gonna be a cartoon character that flicks the moon away to be like 10 inches away from him in 5 seconds and that will be Large Planet Level
 
4,700
442
One day there’s gonna be a cartoon character that flicks the moon away to be like 10 inches away from him in 5 seconds and that will be Large Planet Level
That would actually be barely moon level. Moving the moon an inch per second gets high 6-A results last I’ve heard.

Unless that moon is very big, the speed will always play a massive role in moon feats.
 
318
151
Low 2-C, because people see it as a "god" tier. So whenever a 3D verse is argued to get the tier, even if it's valid, people will do ANYTHING to prevent it from happening because they don't want to see it. Sometimes standards are changed and new rules are made... just to prevent certain characters from getting the tier.

I'm not really a fan of 1-A tiering and up, a lot of the stuff is kinda hard to understand and some of the reasons for the characters being there feels weak.
 
1,548
203
Considering moving a continent can get you pretty far into 5-A already I wouldn’t be surprised
Oh that reminds me, I hate 5-A too 😂
So many calcs inflate every feat between continent busting and planet-busting to that level. The only 5-As I like are Marvel Comics and Bloodborne
 
1,548
203
Tier 1 I can understand, but many of the best characters writing-wise with pages on this wiki are in the Tier 9 to Tier 7 range
 
1,106
279
4-A, because it feels like the entire tier is filled with characters who get there through other means like “creating a world that has star looking things” or “I calc’d this thing (something like a black hole) and it turns out that’s actually 4-A”

I’m not calling these reasonings inherently wrong but it’s surprising that a decently populated tier has barely any actual feats of Destroying multiple Solar Systems/Destroying multiple Stars, at least for Solar System you have stuff like Pre-Crisis Superman sneezing away a Solar System
 
4,270
328
High 5-A. The fact that the tier is called "Dwarf Star level" is really bothering me. In the same way, High 7-A also bothers me

Sub-Relativistic+. I feel like the gap between Baseline and Borderline is way too small
 
1,697
342
tier 1-B because making a fair match for characters in different verses in this tier is nearly impossible
 
6-A is pretty barren, there is pretty much no one in that tier to make matches for.

1-B feels like that middle tier, it's needed for a reason but it's not as "cool" as a tier in of itself compared to other tiers in tier 1
 
318
151
4-A, because it feels like the entire tier is filled with characters who get there through other means like “creating a world that has star looking things” or “I calc’d this thing (something like a black hole) and it turns out that’s actually 4-A”

I’m not calling these reasonings inherently wrong but it’s surprising that a decently populated tier has barely any actual feats of Destroying multiple Solar Systems/Destroying multiple Stars, at least for Solar System you have stuff like Pre-Crisis Superman sneezing away a Solar System
you literally just listed mario's tiers 💀
 
6,053
1,006
Ok, time for mine:

1-A and above: I just don't like Tier 1, in general, since at that point it's basically becomes a debate of "my dimensions are bigger than yours", or in 1-A's case: "my transcendense is bigger than yours"

6-A is a pretty useless tier, as it's tiny in size and there are barely anyone there. I would say High 7-A, Low 4-C and 4-C suffers from the same problem, but at least we have so much more options in these tiers

5-C for reasons explained above. But I'll add Low 5-B as well for the same spot because how awkward it feels
 
4,376
509
i hate 3-a tier. FUCK 3-A, its literally just multi galaxy 2.0. shttty ass pathetic tier, if ur character has this there fodder as shit

I've always hated this tier, it just seems so useless to me
 
Last edited:
1,202
93
I hate high 3-A cuz it’s pretty much a halfway point between 3-A and low 2-C that has way too big of a gap
 
What is the difference between Low 4-C and High 5-A??? It makes no sense to distinguish them and pretty much no-one is in both tiers.

We don't have dwarf planet level, small planet level, planet level, then large planet level.
 
6-A is a useless tier it’s just way too small and continent busting often is just high 6-B which is also small but ironically still more varied

High 6-A is too damn big and it makes the use of At least ratings feel weird sometimes
Say one character in a verse has a 5 exaton feat that they scale above making them At least High 6-A whatever. then another from the same verse has a ultra casual 9 Petaton calculation they’d also be At least High 6-A. Which would give someone the first impression both characters in the verse are in the same ballpark even if by the math they are orders of magnitude apart.
(This applies to tier 5 and up in general tho)
It’s also kinda weird how literally making an explosion that covers the earth’s crust is not the top of Multi Continental level

High 7-A is kinda so small they may as well make it 6-C but isn’t 6-C because the term Mountain busting and feats of busting “Larger Mountains” are kinda synonymous with Vs debating

High 7-C and Low 7-B seem ultra arbitrary as terms and are extremely interchangeable

Tier 1 as a whole (Ironic coming from a Honkai Supporter) but threads just devolve into Hah dimensions go brrr or my hax one shots before you get to breathe
 
Last edited:
1,106
279
I think there’s sort of the irony in the Continental tiers is that from my research, there’s no actual official definition on what makes a continent and what makes a island, I believe Greenland (the largest island) is only about 3.6 times smaller than Australia (the smallest continent)
 
I think there’s sort of the irony in the Continental tiers is that from my research, there’s no actual official definition on what makes a continent and what makes a island, I believe Greenland (the largest island) is only about 3.6 times smaller than Australia (the smallest continent)
I think the only continents where they are big enough to not just be High 6-B are just Asia Africa and North America

As Ironically so from a calculation I saw
Siberia is actually bigger than all of Europe which isn’t even the smallest continent
 
Top