- 15
- 1
just as the title says, but the assumption is the character in question would already have atleast type2 non/trans duality
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
just non duality? no qaulitative superiority or anything (my assumption was you already atleast have type2 and this just one of the ones you exist outside of, i should have clarified)Nonduality Type 1.
It gives a basis for qualitative superiority, but it is best fit for type 1 non-dual considering it's just "being beyond reality and fiction" without further context. And for a real qualitative superiority, the character would have to show that they're qualitatively superior and absolutely no quantifiers (non 1-A) can interact with it by any means. Iirc, being transcendent to both fiction and reality by default when considering the previous qualitative transcendental relationship between that reality and fiction, then I think it should be a single layer above baseline 1-A. If you mean transcending that reality and fiction in an additional R>F layer context, then I think High 1-A is the best fit.just non duality? no qaulitative superiority or anything (my assumption was you already atleast have type2 and this just one of the ones you exist outside of, i should have clarified)
I seeIt gives a basis for qualitative superiority, but it is best fit for type 1 non-dual considering it's just "being beyond reality and fiction" without further context. And for a real qualitative superiority, the character would have to show that they're qualitatively superior and absolutely no quantifiers (non 1-A) can interact with it by any means. Iirc, being transcendent to both fiction and reality by default when considering the previous qualitative transcendental relationship between that reality and fiction, then I think it should be a single layer above baseline 1-A. If you mean transcending that reality and fiction in an additional R>F layer context, then I think High 1-A is the best fit.
i actually forgot to ask something what if said character also cannot reach the quantifiers?It gives a basis for qualitative superiority, but it is best fit for type 1 non-dual considering it's just "being beyond reality and fiction" without further context. And for a real qualitative superiority, the character would have to show that they're qualitatively superior and absolutely no quantifiers (non 1-A) can interact with it by any means. Iirc, being transcendent to both fiction and reality by default when considering the previous qualitative transcendental relationship between that reality and fiction, then I think it should be a single layer above baseline 1-A. If you mean transcending that reality and fiction in an additional R>F layer context, then I think High 1-A is the best fit.