• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Universe level CRT Part 2 (Alternate Dimension Edition)

The core premise of your argument seems to hinge on the idea that a temporal dimension is just a measure of spatial movement, and thus that spatially disjoint areas should have their own time-axes, but that's not necessarily true, as I'll further explain in the response below.
You know, our universe page says “If they are outright called universes or stated to be the size of universes by a reliable source, they should be considered universes.” All I was saying was, something referred to as a different space can have their own time. But since statements, like the one in the quote, is enough. Guess this makes my premise pretty redundant. 🗿
Due to how higher-dimensional spaces work, the universe of three dimensions we are familiar with is just a single slice out of the infinitely-many that comprise the spacetime continuum, and so arbitrarily removing some from the overall structure would hardly have any effect, much like how removing a single point out of the 1-dimensional real number line would result in... the same number line, but one where the choosen point was removed.
I mean, that single slice can be any duration right? And any duration of time have have uncountably infinite intervals. So a “slice” of spacetime wouldn't be so finite.
 
Thank you very much for taking the time to help out Ultima.

Has this discussion been concluded then?
 
You know, our universe page says “If they are outright called universes or stated to be the size of universes by a reliable source, they should be considered universes.” All I was saying was, something referred to as a different space can have their own time. But since statements, like the one in the quote, is enough. Guess this makes my premise pretty redundant. 🗿
That page also does state the following, which seems to clash a bit with your proposal: The Worlds being different bodies of space is not enough to consider them universes, as that does not quite prove they have different timelines. Especially if they are afterlives. Afterlives often are different bodies of space, but are generally condensed in the same timeline unless there's more proof otherwise.

I mean, that single slice can be any duration right? And any duration of time have have uncountably infinite intervals. So a “slice” of spacetime wouldn't be so finite
Not really, no. More accurately, a single slice of the spacetime continuum has no duration at all; it's just a frozen image of the universe, so to speak. If you extend a single slice into an interval, however small, then you are creating a 4-D object, and so that's not really a cross-section anymore.
 
Back
Top