The Saitama Paradox

[Ryukama]

Hello. As we all know, Saitama is a limitless, invincible gag character who can never be beaten and defeats anyone in a single punch. However just like other forms of omnipotence, this one comes with its paradoxes.

Can Saitama one punch himself? If yes then that means Saitama isn't invincible and can be beaten. If no then that means Saitama has limits and can't defeat anyone in a single punch.

What do you guys think?

 

[Blanked]

Your argument has been one-punched.

 

[The_Everlasting]

It depends on whether we take his one-punch ability as a form of hax or raw AP.

If it's AP, I think it's safe to say he cannot one-punch himself, as he can withstand the force of his own punch and thus shouldn't be susceptible to it.

However, if it's a form of one-shotting hax, then I think it's safe to say he can. After all, he's never shown defense against this kind of hax, so if it's used against him, how can he defend himself?

Such is the nature of the One-Punch Man.

 

[Ryukama]

@Ever But Saitama is supposed to be strong enough to one punch anyone. If he can't one punch himself that means he isn't strong enough to one punch anyone. And therefore his punching power has limits. Also even if it is hax, the fact that the hax could work on him means Saitama isn't invincible.

OVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVOVO

 

[The_Everlasting]

But when has Saitama ever been claimed to be invincible? It's just been that he's stronger than anyone.

I think you're wanking him just a bit here.

 

[Royalty1702]

Saitama is limitless, therefore he is not bounded by logic. Debunked.

 

[Ryukama]

@Ever Saitama is a gag character so he is invincible though. That's literally the joke. He always wins. You're just a salty DB fan who doesn't get the nature of the series!

I hope you know I'm joking and that you're playing along.

 

[The_Everlasting]

I am too, I'm just jokingly taking this seriously because I feel it's more fun than the one line comments everyone else is using.

 

[Ryukama]

Lol alright.

 

[Blanked]

I am too, I'm just jokingly taking this seriously because I feel it's more fun than the one line comments everyone else is using.

When you joke around with @Ryukama you have to underline it's a joke at least twice no matter how obvious the joke might be.

 

[Golden_Void]

Newton's third law proves that he can in fact, take his own punches. ƒñö

 

[Ryukama]

Newton's third law proves that he can in fact, take his own punches. ƒñö

Saitama's a gag character so the laws of physics are irrelevant to him though ƒñö ƒñö ƒñö ƒñö

 

[Golden_Void]

Does he B R E A T H E? ƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñö

 

[Ryukama]

Does he B R E A T H E? ƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñöƒñö

Yes and Boros could've defeated him if he kicked slightly more to the right but Saitama is still utterly unbeatable against anyone from any verse cause reasons.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

If Saitama punches himself, they surrender.

 

[Js250476]

Does that mean Boros is limitless to since he still thought he could beat Saitama after saying he had no limits?

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Boros is limitless, while Saitama is beyond limitless.

 

[Royalty1702]

My argument still stands.

 

[Js250476]

Saitama vs Suggsverse when? ovo

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Saitama solos via quality.

 

[Js250476]

Suggsverse debates in a nutshell

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Sucksverse is fodder.

 

[Js250476]

Especially compared to literally anything else in quality

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Except for Dragon Ball

 

[LordAnomanderRake]

Should be at least Tier 0.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

Saitama is so haxxed he is a living paradox.

 

[Blanked]

Saitama is immune on any type of paradox.

 

[Golden_Void]

Saitama > fiction