Small SCP-682 Resistance to BFR CRT

[Super_Nova]

Possible “Resistance to BFR” CRT for SCP-682:

Currently, the closest thing SCP-682 has to resistance to BFR is this: “Dimensional Travel (Escaped from the higher-dimensional Ravelwoods through its own power)”

This is taken from these feats. Now, we’ll want to focus on the “Summer’s Exile cannot be banished to another non-earth plane, only temporarily (usually attempts fails).”

This should be Resistance to BFR but obviously it can be attributed to SCP-682’s reactive evolution and other adaptation hax it has.

First of all, in the same article as that feat, it is stated that while adaptations wear off over time, there’s a chance that SCP-682 will develop a immunity to it. He developed an immunity to guns for example.

The first immunity developed by SCP-682 was to SCP-409, which shows SCP-682 is able to develop permanent adaptations

Now, why would this be Resistance to BFR? Well, SCP-682 has been shown to be completely immune to a bunch of different forms of BFR: “only temporarily (usually attempt fails)”, which means that SCP-682 cannot even be BFR’d in the first place (at least to lower-end BFR as he was successfully BFR’d to Ravelwood due to it’s special properties, still managed to return and adapt to it) + he completely resisted SCP-2521’s attempts to snatch it.

With these feats, it should hopefully lead to the conclusion that SCP-682 has some forms of passive Resistance to BFR due to having an innate immunity to it.

I’m thinking of: “Resistance to BFR (was completely unaffected by various forms of BFR, due to SCP-682’s curse of not being able to stay in any non-earth plane and being immune to SCP-2521)

 

[Super_Nova]

Bump (what does this mean)

 

[Phoenks]

Bumps are used to get your thread back to the top of the listing and notify those involved in the thresd, so if they get buried or go inactive you can bring them back to life.


Anyway, I'm neutral on this upgrade as I feel like "usual attempts fail" isn't specific enough.

Also, him resisting 2521 could just be superior LS, couldn't it? Is 682 actually resisting being teleported there?

 

[Super_Nova]

Bumps are used to get your thread back to the top of the listing and notify those involved in the thresd, so if they get buried or go inactive you can bring them back to life.


Anyway, I'm neutral on this upgrade as I feel like "usual attempts fail" isn't specific enough.

Also, him resisting 2521 could just be superior LS, couldn't it? Is 682 actually resisting being teleported there?

SCP-2521 only steals information, but when it does, it attempts to steal the entire person/thing, so maybe it tried stealing the entirety of SCP-682, but couldn’t do to BFR resistance and stole the flesh only. Although, the timeframe of the even was particularly small so who knows.

For the other part, the fact that 682 cannot leave earth should be grounds for BFR. Although, the article in general does imply that any sort of BFR is temporary and usually short, the strongest lasting a year or so, while being in higher dimensions. So I do believe that this ability should give SCP-682 at least something like “Limited Resistance to BFR”

 

[Super_Nova]

Also, there are other feats that I left out like how SCP-682 escapes SCP-5175’s extradimensional plane which is not in “baseline reality”.

 

[Phoenks]

682 can only get resistance to BFR if it has concrete feats of resisting being teleported/sent away. If it is successfully sent away and just comes back, it isn't resistance, it's dimensional travel.

 

[Super_Nova]

682 can only get resistance to BFR if it has concrete feats of resisting being teleported/sent away. If it is successfully sent away and just comes back, it isn't resistance, it's dimensional travel.

I do believe though since it says “The Exile's longest successful banishment was to the Ravelwoods” insinuates that “successful” means that the BFR worked to a degree and “failure” means that SCP-682 didn’t get BFR’d at all and resisted it. I’ll wait for other people’s opinions firstly though.

 

[Overlord775]

You are putting a narrative into it where there's none.

Failure can mean any number of thing ranging from them messing up the BFR to 682 escaping containement before it was BFR'd. It's waaay to vague to use, especially since it doesn't even explicidly state that failures happened.

 

[Comiphorous]

682 was never teleported, and it does have the LS to easily lift and overpower 682, as it was able to lift a UIU building (whether the image is inaccurate on what he did, lifting an entire building, whether it be casually or with some effort, should not be superhuman). 682 was simply never taken for whatever reason, when SCP-2521 should be fully capable of lifting 682. from AP, and LS. (this depiction was taken for granite, but all of his other depictions in drawings aren't. so unsure how this isn't in the same boat as them)

 

[Overlord775]

Could you tell me where you go that from ? because it's not in 2521's foundation article

 

[Nehz_XZX]

Could you tell me where you go that from ? because it's not in 2521's foundation article

It should be from here.

 

[Overlord775]

Thanks.

Anyway, first of is the fact that 682 is also in the same range of strenght as the feat, so it simply thrashing enough could have deterred 2521

thought there's also the fact the lizard vocalized something to the latter, with it having an history of messing with other scps by just talking/being near them

 

[Super_Nova]

Thanks.

Anyway, first of is the fact that 682 is also in the same range of strenght as the feat, so it simply thrashing enough could have deterred 2521

thought there's also the fact the lizard vocalized something to the latter, with it having an history of messing with other scps by just talking/being near them

There can’t be time for thrashing because the entire encounter lasted 2 seconds, and SCP-2521 wouldn’t have been affected either way because it has Tier 0 durability.

 

[Nehz_XZX]

Thanks.

You're welcome.

 

[Overlord775]

There can’t be time for thrashing because the entire encounter lasted 2 seconds, and SCP-2521 wouldn’t have been affected either way because it has Tier 0 durability.

W H A T

 

[Super_Nova]

W H A T

???

 

[Overlord775]

Where the hec are you getting that 2521 has tier 0 durability ?

 

[Dragonite007]

Where the hec are you getting that 2521 has tier 0 durability ?

Durability: At least Athlete level | Boundless (Was unable to be destroyed by both SCP-INTEGER and SCP-6820 on separate occasions for extended periods of time)

 

[Super_Nova]

Where the hec are you getting that 2521 has tier 0 durability ?

As @Dragon replied, SCP-2521 has survived attacks from 2 Tier 0 beings, one of which (SCP-6820) can effect even stronger versions of SCP-682 than the one shown in the termination log.

You can’t just “shake off” SCP-2521.

 

[Overlord775]

A

so he has a profile

wait

" At least Superhuman (Portrayed as lifting an entire building, although it's unclear how literal this depiction is meant to be[7])"

 

[Super_Nova]

A

so he has a profile

wait

" At least Superhuman (Portrayed as lifting an entire building, although it's unclear how literal this depiction is meant to be[7])"

umm… what exactly are you insinuating now? Do you have a problem with the LS key?

 

[Overlord775]

682 has higher lifting strength

 

[Comiphorous]

682 has higher lifting strength

not sure why though. whether the picture is inaccurate or not he lifted (at least) a small building, if anything they should be close in LS from their feats.

even if he didn't have the LS, 682 physically cannot do anything about it trying to grab him due to it being able to give the middle finger to his far stronger, true form.

nothing seems to have stopped SCP-2521 from teleporting 682, and he just didn't for some reason.

 

[Overlord775]

it could also be that he just got scared, like what happened with that shadow scp

 

[Comiphorous]

it could also be that he just got scared, like what happened with that shadow scp

i mean, he could have? but he seemed completely on board with trying to kidnap him, and genuinely seemed to try and do so and only got a small chunk of him. nothing indicated he got scared, and more seemed like he failed to kidnap 682.