Peppypony
She/Her- 1,839
- 271
If Character A is confirmed within their own canon they have resistance to passives, let's say the canon quote is-
"the user is immune to any capability from the opponent that's always activated"
for example and always activated = passive (also in this verse, capability = power btw just like how powers in MHA are called "quirks").
Let's say Character B is from a different verse. If Character A had a match against Character B on this site, would it be a NLF for any say that none of Character B's passives won't work against Character A in matches? Or is it only a NLF to assume that Character A's resistance works on a 4D scale or any dimension beyond that when it's never been shown to be capable of doing so?
"the user is immune to any capability from the opponent that's always activated"
for example and always activated = passive (also in this verse, capability = power btw just like how powers in MHA are called "quirks").
Let's say Character B is from a different verse. If Character A had a match against Character B on this site, would it be a NLF for any say that none of Character B's passives won't work against Character A in matches? Or is it only a NLF to assume that Character A's resistance works on a 4D scale or any dimension beyond that when it's never been shown to be capable of doing so?