• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rebuble uses Taunt on Weekly...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vergil slices with Yamato and immediately cuts through her aura with the help of it's spatial Manipulation
 
Doesn't he negate only Cinder's aura since his Spatial Manipulation allows him to destroy forcefields?
 
No he cleanly slices through her as well since she doesn't resist it's spatial Manipulation
 
There isn't really a point in specifying that space cutting ignores durability tbh.
 
Vergil should take this for the reasons stated above, also including the fact that he can destroy force fields before, has a much more advanced teleportation via teleporting himself to his opponent, or teleporting his opponent to him, using doppelgänger for much more devastation, Regenerationn with the devil trigger ability, and homing attacks with the spectral blades that he fires.
 
Hold on, I have a question, why does it say in vergil's profile that it doesn't have durability ignoring feats when it's shown to cut through dimensions, as well as the fact that it's stated in the same paragraph to have dimension cutting capabilities?
 
I mean, there isn't really a point in saying that something ignores dura when it naturally does.

For example, Akro negates dura with magic due to verse mechanics but it's listed as such only because magic = dura negation isn't a standard assumption (And because "Negates durability with almost every notable power" would be dumb)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top