Ayewale
He/Him- 1,070
- 788
I looked over Sans page and I noticed two very odd things.
"Attack Potency: Small Building level physically (The weakest monster who can be faced in combat, even below Monster Kid in terms of raw strength. However, he is still roughly comparable to the lowest tier monsters)"
"Durability: Small Building level (Should be at least somewhat comparable to zero DETERMINATION Frisk, who could tank an oven overloading and emitting this much force without any damage whatsoever)"
"Range: At least dozens of meters via bone attacks, significantly higher via Gaster Blasters and teleportation to an unknown extent"
Where are any of these figures coming from? His durability is a very big assumption. There's no reliable way to compare his defense with that of Frisk's, so this statement is completely unfounded. A much better statistic for his durability would be 'Unknown', since at the very least that wouldn't be such a blantant speculation.
His Attack Potency also seems pretty confusing. It's stating that "Well, he SHOULD be comparable to the strength of the lowest-tier monsters", which is a statement that fails. How do we know that he's on their level? What if he's below it? The only thing stating he's on their level is his ATK stat when compared to Froggit-except the only damage we've seen Froggit do is SOUL Damage, which ignores conventional durability and would not be a reliable indicator of actual strength. So this isn't reliable to decide his AP. Again, it'd be virtually better if he had 'Unknown'.
Finally, his range. While not too bad, I'm wondering where "dozens of meters" is coming from, since there's no indication of how far his bones can cover. Gaster Blasters have a higher range than the bones, but we still don't know the bones' range. To be fair, "Unknown" range doesn't sound very right.
"Attack Potency: Small Building level physically (The weakest monster who can be faced in combat, even below Monster Kid in terms of raw strength. However, he is still roughly comparable to the lowest tier monsters)"
"Durability: Small Building level (Should be at least somewhat comparable to zero DETERMINATION Frisk, who could tank an oven overloading and emitting this much force without any damage whatsoever)"
"Range: At least dozens of meters via bone attacks, significantly higher via Gaster Blasters and teleportation to an unknown extent"
Where are any of these figures coming from? His durability is a very big assumption. There's no reliable way to compare his defense with that of Frisk's, so this statement is completely unfounded. A much better statistic for his durability would be 'Unknown', since at the very least that wouldn't be such a blantant speculation.
His Attack Potency also seems pretty confusing. It's stating that "Well, he SHOULD be comparable to the strength of the lowest-tier monsters", which is a statement that fails. How do we know that he's on their level? What if he's below it? The only thing stating he's on their level is his ATK stat when compared to Froggit-except the only damage we've seen Froggit do is SOUL Damage, which ignores conventional durability and would not be a reliable indicator of actual strength. So this isn't reliable to decide his AP. Again, it'd be virtually better if he had 'Unknown'.
Finally, his range. While not too bad, I'm wondering where "dozens of meters" is coming from, since there's no indication of how far his bones can cover. Gaster Blasters have a higher range than the bones, but we still don't know the bones' range. To be fair, "Unknown" range doesn't sound very right.