- 851
- 125
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Literally him in regards to my 'arguments': "you never actually make a compelling argument"That is not the case here though.
Literally him in regards to my 'arguments': "you never actually make a compelling argument"
You don't gotta chime in, its very blatantly there. Think what you want but you dont actually get to decide that 'my arguments the best and yours is the worst'
This is a general discussion thread for a franchise the odds of getting a third is significantly lower than a versus thread or CRT so in terms of rules it pretty much comes down to what you each individually decide are the rules and at that point it's like Achilles talking to that tortoise.Literally him in regards to my 'arguments': "you never actually make a compelling argument"
You don't gotta chime in, its very blatantly there. Think what you want but you dont actually get to decide that 'my arguments the best and yours is the worst'
Thank you for bringing proof.The canon un-split established that not everything is 1:1 between the different Pokemon media, but they share the same worldview. If I'm being honest I don't think this means that everything that can be done by a Pokemon in the manga can also be done by a Pokemon of the same species in the anime or game.
Imagine Creatures Inc. were making a game where Mewtwo fights evenly with Deoxys and defeats him without targetting his weak spot in the game's storyboards. Do you think that Junichi Masuda and Satoshi Tajiri themselves would see it and not allow it to happen because it goes against what happened in the Adventures manga? The answer is no, because the Pokemon Company and Nintendo aren't micromanaging every single detail. They don't care if the power levels of Pokemon differ depending on the medium, all they care about is that it fits their general standards of the Pokemon World
Small details like powerscaling (or minor details about a Pokemon's special abilities that aren't from the Dex) don't always have to be consistent in order for something to fit the general worldview of Pokemon.
The Pokemon Adventures manga, for example, contains a small detail about Dragon type Pokemon that doesn't exist anywhere else in the verse. This wasn't rejected by the Pokemon Company, not because they think Rayquaza in the games and and anime can do the exact same thing, but presumably because its such a small detail that it doesn't matter. They don't have the time to micromanage everything and make sure every little detail is consistent- the blog even includes an interview with the Adventures writer claiming that some of his ideas would have gotten rejected if he had asked the Pokemon Company for guidance before the chapters are published.
The whole "same worldview" thing and strict guidelines are just there to make sure that there isn't anything in Adventures or the anime that breaks the setting of Pokemon like Rayquaza's head actually being its weiner or Lt. Surge being a member of the Viet Cong
However I do think Jinx has a point. Just because an adaptation is very faithful to the source material does not neccessarily mean it is canon.Faithfulness to the content =/= Being mainline canon.
Again, they are parallel timelines, blatantly stated.Just because an adaptation is very faithful to the source material does not neccessarily mean it is canon.
Again, they are parallel timelines, blatantly stated.
Well it seems like the main debate is on how exactly the Wiki treats this idea of continuities sharing a cosmology. To make this argument more constructive and to hopefully reach a conclusion, I believe you two should take this to staff and ask for clarification. Perhaps the current Canon page needs a revision because that appears to be the main topic of debate.Given the Anime, Manga and Games take place in their own continuities and are drastically different mediums, theres no direct scaling point to be made. Much like every other verse on this wiki does, separate pages are made for separate continuities, even if they are 'parallel' versions. Pokemon should also follow this basis instead of compositing, especially when there is plentiful content in each unlike very minor exceptions you can probably get away with.
I believe that this has already been done when the exact same argument was brought up in the canon unsplit thread and the staff accepted it. Literally the same exact stuff was brought up by Ayewale years ago, accepted at first, then debunked and the debunk was accepted by staff. This is the answer here.Well it seems like the main debate is on how exactly the Wiki treats this idea of continuities sharing a cosmology. To make this argument more constructive and to hopefully reach a conclusion, I believe you two should take this to staff and ask for clarification. Perhaps the current Canon page needs a revision because that appears to be the main topic of debate.
Well Pokemon is among the most popular and iconic verses on this Wiki. I am certain that we can gather lots of supporters. I myself would be willing to help out whenever I can no matter what ends up being accepted.Obviously though its a huge endeavour and no one is willing to work together to ease the workload.
I wouldnt say within the wiki, its progress is very stagnant and its only barely been able to update itself with Legends ZA. I make a Pokemon profile occasionally to get some idea but i cant say i personally agree with the scaling and verse standards Pokemon has right now so i tend to avoid it. Literally nothing has been said for Legends ZA despite everything. I would be willing to help in the quality maintenance department, and i made CRTs that arent going anywhereWell Pokemon is among the most popular and iconic verses on this Wiki. I am certain that we can gather lots of supporters. I myself would be willing to help out whenever I can no matter what ends up being accepted.
you overestimate people here. Even before when Ayewale did the canon split and the wiki was far more alive, especially pokemon-wise, the actual revision failed. The workload was too big and the person in question quit. The other supporters did some minor things but the verse essentially didn't change in the course of a year or two.Well Pokemon is among the most popular and iconic verses on this Wiki. I am certain that we can gather lots of supporters. I myself would be willing to help out whenever I can no matter what ends up being accepted.
Mayhaps you should consider joining another power scaling wiki in the meantime?I make a Pokemon profile occasionally to get some idea but i cant say i personally agree with the scaling and verse standards Pokemon has right now so i tend to avoid it.
No ty. There aren't any better or established power scaling wikis and im not ride or die for Pokemon. I know what im about hereMayhaps you should consider joining another power scaling wiki in the meantime?
Ok let's put these issues in a hierarchy of importance, address the most important one at the top, and move down from there.Take your pick but the main ones for me:
Inconsistent Page Quality - Most pages differ in format and quality, some even being in different tiers based on a flawed Abomasnow feat (which shouldnt scale to AP as a passive effect, as well as it being a special Abomasnow). Profiles also cant seem to choose a standard naming convention. with some pages being named after their pre-evolutions while some are named after the final evolution, and on top of that the main image of the profile not representing this properly
Continuity mixing - Huge mix of cross-scaling, like comparing game characters physicals to Ash Ketchum for no reason, or even to stuff like using Pokemon Conquest abilities in regards to wild species profiles (Conquest is its own thing). A lot of these characters could have separate profiles for their own interpretations. Stuff like Pokemon GO and even Masters EX attempting to be mixed into the canon too which are very clearly separate.
Not kept up to date - Missing so much info from the latest games like S/V and Z-A
Outdated Verse page - use of uncredited fanart, bad formatting, outdated descriptions such as P&A
(Also faulty scaling but thats imo)
It might be a good idea to pause all Pokemon CRTs while we figure things outI will say that outside of the continuity mixing, which I think is very much fine as I said, the rest of the issues are a real problem. I can't keep up with the amount of stuff by myself and if you've seen it, most of the CRTs done by others cover only legendaries, mostly tier 1 stuff.
Well for me, id rather clean the slate and get rid of lower quality profiles to decide that conclusively (that also helps adjust verse page). This will make it less of a daunting challenge to fix over 500+ profiles. Legendary Profiles will probably be kept though, which also have their own outdated issues.Ok let's put these issues in a hierarchy of importance, address the most important one at the top, and move down from there.
So we have:
1. Continuity mixing
2. Outdated info
3. Outdated verse page
4. Page quality
Which of these problems is the most pressing one that needs to be fixed quickly?
I will not, especially if the revisions you'll do in question are canon splitting.It might be a good idea to pause all Pokemon CRTs while we figure things out
I dunno about deletion but yes, we need to revise a lot of profiles (For example, I believe the Magikarp one uses "via power scaling" reasoning)Well for me, id rather clean the slate and get rid of lower quality profiles to decide that conclusively (that also helps adjust verse page). This will make it less of a daunting challenge to fix over 500+ profiles. Legendary Profiles will probably be kept though, which also have their own outdated issues.
We definitely need more thoughts on that and have a hopefully respectful discussion about it. Are there other active Pokemon supporters?I think Continuity Mixing needs to be fixed and separated depending on the main mediums of game, anime and manga, as its the main ground of the power scaling. Fixing that first also gives a better gateway into number 2 and 3 which is Page Quality and Outdated. Obviously though, people disagree with that and want to keep compositing...which the entire wiki has moved on from and make separate profiles for apart from us.
Noted!I had recently made a profile for Anime Cynthia as opposed to her Game counterpart to try and illustrate, at least to myself how its possible, even though due to the continuity mixing, the stats are essentially the same.
Well it is just a suggestion that I think might help make things easier but alright.I will not, especially if the revisions you'll do in question are canon splitting.
You have a good point. Various characters across different continuities have entirely different arsenals. Red's team is infamously different across different games for example.Even outside of scaling stats, stuff like what Pokemon Lusamine actually has access too for example, are vastly different between continuities. Its not just about scaling the stats, but their arsenals too.
Definitely. Many of our current profiles are not following the Pokemon Standards page. It is probably a good idea to collect a list of those pages.In my opinion, the most important thing is to fix the standards and make sure the verse follows them (that should make everything else easier).
This seems like a good idea to me. Maybe a blog that documents all moves and how they'd be indexed should be made?For example:
knowing what hax are each move = helps when you have to fix the profiles, because it would just be copying and pasting that In each one.
Good idea.What kind of things can each one scale to, what do we consider special cases that no one else scales to... For better or for worse, any kind of division between versions is also relevant to standards.
What CRT are you working on currently?I will not, especially if the revisions you'll do in question are canon splitting.
Legendary scaling with the varies rating for the species profiles and I am trying to figure out how to rework my Mega Evolution CRT that failed before. I think I can establish an energy system but I need material from ORAS for that to work so that what I'll be playing soon.What CRT are you working on currently?
Why varies and not just different profiles and keys?Legendary scaling with the varies rating for the species profiles and I am trying to figure out how to rework my Mega Evolution CRT that failed before. I think I can establish an energy system but I need material from ORAS for that to work so that what I'll be playing soon.
Because several legendaries are confirmed to be species rather than one individual creature. There are countless more that are individuals but some are clearly meant to be different among several. This kind of change to legendaries was also accepted in the canon unsplit as a compromise that we need to account for that but sadly nobody bothered. Currently I am working to figure it out.Why varies and not just different profiles and keys?
I mean I agree, but I feel like that also justifies different profiles, not just a varies rating. Also where was that accepted? I looked at the canon unsplit blog and I found the opposite- see the second last section in this doc titled "Legendaries need to be composited"Because several legendaries are confirmed to be species rather than one individual creature. There are countless more that are individuals but some are clearly meant to be different among several. This kind of change to legendaries was also accepted in the canon unsplit as a compromise that we need to account for that but sadly nobody bothered. Currently I am working to figure it out.
in the actual thread it was discussed with mods and the conclusion was that we do get some varies ratings. It's one thing when a legendary is an individual creature, they mostly aren't inconsistent, Necrozma always lights up the world, Groudon and Kyogre always lift the continents, ect. but when a Legendary Pokemon is explicitly a species then the game changes a bit as suddenly their power can vary throughout their appearances. There's often a minimum, like Lugia having a High 6-C feat in Pokedex, but then other appearances proceed to vary. Another example of a mon that shouldn't be scaled as an individual is Darkrai who we've seen scale around High 6-A (Tobias), 5-B to High 3-A (Z-A and Journeys) and Low 1-C (Darkrai movie, Pokepark technically). Knowing that there's more than 1 Darkrai shows that we can have them vary in power and that comes from the inherent feature of species profiles to have one.I mean I agree, but I feel like that also justifies different profiles, not just a varies rating. Also where was that accepted? I looked at the canon unsplit blog and I found the opposite- see the second last section in this doc titled "Legendaries need to be composited"