- 21,078
- 29,992
The Anime for the One Piece Manga has been non-canon in this wiki, hindering us from timeframes, extensions on feats, etc. From the One Piece verse page, I quote.
But recently, we've gotten a statement from the staff of the Anime production which states
The issue is that it counts as nitpicking canon from an arc. Wano currently has no contradictions with source material except added scenes, and now that we have information that Oda is technically tied in with the production of the anime and considers events in there canon, so there should be no issue with using other feats in the anime.
My suggestion is to consider the Wano Country Arc's anime scenes and every arc after Wano in the future as canon as well unless it directly contradicts the anime like in the examples currently on the verse page. This means that feats, calcs, timeframes, powers, abilities, and more that take place within this arc should be considered canon. Statements should be taken on a case-by-case basis and should be discussed on if they should be allowed in scaling or not.
Examples of censorship-based contradictions: Luffy's skull was pierced through the back by one of Jango's attacks, but in the anime, he catches it with his mouth. Red-leg Zeff cuts off his leg to escape from wreckage in the anime, but in the manga, he cuts it off and eats it to survive. During his fight with Absalom, Sanji was pierced completely through the chest by a blade and dropped Nami in order to keep blood off of her dress, whereas the anime simply had him pummeled with punches, and thus couldn't hold onto Nami anymore. These are just to name a few. There are dozens to hundreds of these cases both pre time-skip and post time-skip. Examples of contradictions in the anime for abilities and powerscaling: Fujitora vs Luffy has different statements and displays Ferocious Tiger as bending space in the anime, which differs greatly from the manga. Smoker was shown capable of holding his own against Doflamingo and only fell once he attempted to protect his comrades, but the manga displays Doflamingo one-shotting him without any fight occuring. Mont-D'or's power is displayed as putting Luffy within a book in the anime and being susceptible to outside assaults without realizing it, but the manga only displays this when Luffy is staring at the pages of the book and very quickly returns to his senses once Nami calls out to him.
- Regarding the canon: In terms of canon material, this wiki uses the manga strictly. The anime is considered non-canon here. In the case of anime, it contradicts statements, feats, personalities, and abilities of characters in many cases. This happens with censorship, filler content in canon material, and pacing.
But recently, we've gotten a statement from the staff of the Anime production which states
The translator sums it up and says"When drawing a battle in the anime that did not appear in the manga, we will make sure we have Oda's approval, and we will express it and merge it with the manga content as much as possible," the memo reads.
Which means that the certain fights that take place in this timeframe which haven't been in the manga are now considered canon, like the new Whitebeard vs Oden or Big Mom vs Kaido.Expectations will be high for the Onigashima Raid and it will be portrayed as complementing the manga rather than being plain filler.
The issue is that it counts as nitpicking canon from an arc. Wano currently has no contradictions with source material except added scenes, and now that we have information that Oda is technically tied in with the production of the anime and considers events in there canon, so there should be no issue with using other feats in the anime.
My suggestion is to consider the Wano Country Arc's anime scenes and every arc after Wano in the future as canon as well unless it directly contradicts the anime like in the examples currently on the verse page. This means that feats, calcs, timeframes, powers, abilities, and more that take place within this arc should be considered canon. Statements should be taken on a case-by-case basis and should be discussed on if they should be allowed in scaling or not.