XitSign
He/Him- 3,134
- 1,791
Hello. A concern was raised on This Crt and I wanted to adress it with Calc Group members.
TLDR:
- A reliable character claims that the verse's fusion mechanic creates a new character "greater than the sum of its parts", thus 'at least' the value of all members of the fusion combined. So a multiplier value when characters of the same strength fuse.
- We are attempting to apply this to an accepted calc.
- We are also attempting to apply this to characters who are equal to a fusion, and then fuse to become stronger still (Ex. Character A is already a fusion. Characters B and C are equal to A. Characters B and C fuse, so we were going to give them an at least 2x in that fused state compared to Character A based on the statement of how fusions works)
Is this process correct? Is it incorrect? Is this an example of calc stacking? And why would it be if it is compared to an example like the Dragonball multiplier chains?
TLDR:
- A reliable character claims that the verse's fusion mechanic creates a new character "greater than the sum of its parts", thus 'at least' the value of all members of the fusion combined. So a multiplier value when characters of the same strength fuse.
- We are attempting to apply this to an accepted calc.
- We are also attempting to apply this to characters who are equal to a fusion, and then fuse to become stronger still (Ex. Character A is already a fusion. Characters B and C are equal to A. Characters B and C fuse, so we were going to give them an at least 2x in that fused state compared to Character A based on the statement of how fusions works)
Is this process correct? Is it incorrect? Is this an example of calc stacking? And why would it be if it is compared to an example like the Dragonball multiplier chains?
