Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
MHA: World Heroes' Mission and Team Up Mission
- Thread starter TheRustyOne
- Start date
- Status
- 29,539
- 24,356
One staff member has approved it, from what I can tell, but there should probably be a second one.
- 10,426
- 9,352
I'm fine with it.
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
- 29,539
- 24,356
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
Three non Therefir staff have now
I didn’t quote Therefir cause he’s made it obvious so I don’t think it’s needed
- 29,539
- 24,356
The calc group members don't count for revision threads.
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
But why
They are literally the math people
- 7,903
- 11,746
Second class citizens fr, where are the calc group member rights
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
- 29,539
- 24,356
Because this isn't a calc thread?
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
This is still seeing if a the calculations are in order and the scaling is good
Half of that is their domain, with their approval disapproval powers
Also their included on the staff member list, they count as staff what’s the point in separating it even more, just makes these things take longer, with how only O N E, non calc Group staff has given an opinion
Bruh
He/Him- 1,426
- 1,348
- 29,539
- 24,356
Yeah, and approving the calcs is what they've done. That's a separate area to applying the calcs.
- 9,338
- 8,071
What's even the point of this?
@Planck69 @ElixirBlue @DarkDragonMedeus @Everything12
Any help to finish this thread? These are the main points of this revision.
Last edited:
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
Does this usually happen?
- 29,539
- 24,356
It's not a completely minor revision, so I thought it'd be best if at least two staff members signed off on it. Especially considering that the one who has so far isn't familiar with MHA.
- 3,044
- 3,145
Yeah, and the calc group already approved of the calculations.
Whether or not a CRT gets a pass is not a part of their glorious job. Non-calc group members don't approve calculations. Non-image helper members don't help with handling images on the wiki. Etc...
- 10,454
- 11,119
- Thread starter
- #101
Bump.
- 29,539
- 24,356
You know, while I may have different thoughts about how the scaling should go, I won't be prepared to tackle them for several weeks down the line and I don't want this to be unnecessarily dragged out when many knowledgeable non-staff users are supporting it, so I'll say that the proposed revisions look fine (for now) and it would probably be safe to apply them.
- 10,454
- 11,119
- Thread starter
- #103
Alright, I'll start making the changes as soon as I can.
- 10,454
- 11,119
- Thread starter
- #104
Alright, I believe I'm done.
Did I miss anything?
Did I miss anything?
Mapl3Sy4up
Username Only- 5,339
- 3,025
Not to my knowledge
- 10,454
- 11,119
- Thread starter
- #106
This thread can be closed then.
- Status
