• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Kamen Rider Gaim Acausality 5

Type 4: Irregular Causality: Characters with this type of Acausality operate on a different and irregular system of cause and effect than regular causality. This grants them resistance to abilities such as Causality Manipulation, Fate Manipulation, and Precognition, among others.


Type 5: Causality Transcendence: Characters with this type of Acausality are completely independent of cause and effect, existing outside causality. Characters of this nature require evidence of being unable to be changed by any effect that relies on a system of causality, meaning that interacting with them normally is impossible.

Though the character is completely Independent of causality to the point of being unaffected by any outside change, this only extends to as far as evidence shows and not to things beyond it's feats.

Note: Being completely independent of time or laws; or similar forces, does not make you completely independent of causality without the relationship between these forces and causality being clarified, with it only being considered as evidence for an irregular relationship with causality otherwise.


Can you elaborate on why Type 5 applies and not Type 4?
 
No, he's erased because that what he want to, it has nothing to do with Sougo. And just to remember his power was taken by ridewatch which can take away 9-D power (while he is 8-D only), and not only the Another Ridewatch of Time Jacker take his power but also the Gaim ridewatch of Sougo team, he doesn't have much power left.
Why would he EVER choose that?
 
Can you elaborate on why Type 5 applies and not Type 4?
He transcends life-death, destruction-creation absolute fate/law that superior and affecting law of causality and thank to that he become untouchable or incorporeality or whatever it is.
 
Below are several examples of Acausality (Type 5) currently on the wiki.
  • https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/S...earchUID=40121f53-b970-4aa6-8557-db8b1bc70516
    • Acausality (Type 5. The nature of the Ultimate Void is different from any conceivable cosmos and is a changeless totality)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Gods from outside of the mortal plane are completely beyond linear time and reside in a state where all events are always happening simultaneously)
    • Acausality (Type 5; Exists outside of the causality system of the stories of the Extra-Universal Gods)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Exists as the very dimension of time, transcending the physical world and acting as the very reason for time's existence. Should be beyond any higher dimensions of time, which there can be an arbitrary amount of)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Exists outside the system of the heavenly records and space-time. It is imperceptible / incomprehensible even from the point of view of acausal beings such as the HRE, and is stated to be beyond fate, plot and causality itself.
    • Acausality (Type 5; Yahweh's plan is stated to have been an all-encompassing "scheme" which contains all of creation, with Destiny of the Endless having described events such as Michael's arrival at his home as all a part of this "scheme" and Destiny having been the source of cause and effect in Yahweh's cosmos. Lucifer specifically is described as having escaped his function from the scheme and as such the causality of it)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Became an existence which is no longer a part of the universe, with nobody being able to neither interact with nor remember her anymore, as she's now completely outside time, cause and effect, without any kind of connection to the world)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Exists completely outside of the chessboard and is unrestrained by the limitations of the Human Domain, including that of fate, time and causality)
    • Acausality (Type 5; Oblivion has existed before anything, and will exist after everything. Oblivion predates the Marvel Multiverse and its laws. Oblivion is also above the likes of The Living Tribunal, an entity who governs the cosmic entities.)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Exists outside the concept of Fate, Possibilities, Space-Time and Causality)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Having narrated itself into [non]existence alongside all possible combinations of characters, the "shell" of the Self-Reference ENGINE is in a state where it is always beginning to tell/is telling/has already told all stories simultaneously)
    • Acausality (Type 5. He is "unstuck in existence", unbound by the rules of Paradox Space, causality and canon which even the Horrorterrors are still part of)
    • Acausality (Type 5. Exists outside the nature of cause and effect)
    • Acausality (Type 5; When she became a deity, her human self vanished from history as if she never existed. Alovenus is a singularity whose birth had less of occurring than the birth of the universe itself. As a singularity, she is unbound by all laws, all laws and providence are contained within her)
Based on the above, it would seem that the OP is enough for Acausality (Type 5).
 
@Firestorm808 some of those examples for type 5 Acausality likely aren’t valid anymore with the new standards, though there’d need to be a CRT for type 5 to evaluate which qualifies and what doesn’t
 
@Firestorm808 Yeah it’s most likely from back when being 1-A by default gave you type 5 Acausality for a good chunk of those pages. Once I’m free I’ll try to make a CRT on Type 5 Acausality on who qualifies and who doesn’t
 
@Firestorm808 Yeah it’s most likely from back when being 1-A by default gave you type 5 Acausality for a good chunk of those pages. Once I’m free I’ll try to make a CRT on Type 5 Acausality on who qualifies and who doesn’t
Since you're already here would you mind to give your opinion?
 
Last edited:
Going off the newer standard this wouldn’t exactly qualify for type 5 Acausality. For the new standard you need to have an explicit statement that because you transcend cause and effect itself that you’re a completely unchangeable being. If you have something like transcending the world but it has no correlation whatsoever with you being unbounded by causality at all then it won’t count for type 5. The whole “he has no future” statement can be used for type 2 Acausality but that’s about it.
 
Going off the newer standard this wouldn’t exactly qualify for type 5 Acausality. For the new standard you need to have an explicit statement that because you transcend cause and effect itself that you’re a completely unchangeable being. If you have something like transcending the world but it has no correlation whatsoever with you being unbounded by causality at all then it won’t count for type 5. The whole “he has no future” statement can be used for type 2 Acausality but that’s about it.
He transcends the material worlds and the duality of Destruction-Creation which is fundamental aspect, absolute fate/unchangeable law of multiverse that superior and affect law of causality, wouldn't that qualify for new standard Acausality 5?
 
Last edited:
Not really, creation and destruction in of itself doesn’t have much to do with Causality. Affecting the law of causality means they’d have causality hax, nothing about them being beyond causality and becoming an unchangeable being because of you beyond causality, which is the new standard for type 5. Though I’d argue even in the old standard I’m not sure if this would really pass either. Like I said I’m seeing type 2 more than type 5.
 
Back
Top