- 1,746
- 146
Ok. I did have discussed with my friends about conceptual , we did a lot of argument but i have specified the main point , so if i'm wrong plz checked for me.
1. Friend : "Just forced or overwhelmed concept type 3 by another concept type 3 does it can fit for type 2 ?"
Me : "No , it just type 3 but higher potency"
2. Friend : " Just have fantastical analogy look similar to concept type 2 but it's weird to me is still fine for type 2 ?
Me : "Can you put an example ?"
Friend : "This guy ...."
He put Yogiri Takatou
Me : "ahhhhh could you explain why ?"
Friend : "Ok this is to long.
First they were used analogy about the dome which encompassed concept it look weird to me , compared to real life people and dome , does the dome is transcended people ? No , the dome just covered them doesn't mean it's transcended them , oh oh maybe if not clearly enough then used universe and people , universe itself is much incomprehensible to people but it's still not transcended us in the same significant point as how concept type 2 unbound from reality , sorry this analogy is failed to me."
Me : "What about higher-order..."
Friend : "No exception , the side who could to explain is you , just said higher-order thing is not elucidated the significant point that i said above , if the higher-order that take precedence over the lower-order of concept type 3 then it just type 3 with higher potency like what your said "
Me: "Yogiri exist in the begining and the end of...."
Friend : "No , other ones have omnipresent since the start and end of universe does is it transcended universe ? , I guess no , your can be embodied concept type 3 and exist in such statement which is omnipresent feat."
Me: " What the significant point did your said ?"
Friend: "It's a statement would prove analogy of concept like plato cave , a feats from ID is not shown it , if you wanna use analogy to prove your concept feat , it should better to use something in same kind of plato cave."
Me: Got only a silence.
Sorry for a long conversation , doesn't me or friend said it wrong ?
1. Friend : "Just forced or overwhelmed concept type 3 by another concept type 3 does it can fit for type 2 ?"
Me : "No , it just type 3 but higher potency"
2. Friend : " Just have fantastical analogy look similar to concept type 2 but it's weird to me is still fine for type 2 ?
Me : "Can you put an example ?"
Friend : "This guy ...."
He put Yogiri Takatou
Me : "ahhhhh could you explain why ?"
Friend : "Ok this is to long.
First they were used analogy about the dome which encompassed concept it look weird to me , compared to real life people and dome , does the dome is transcended people ? No , the dome just covered them doesn't mean it's transcended them , oh oh maybe if not clearly enough then used universe and people , universe itself is much incomprehensible to people but it's still not transcended us in the same significant point as how concept type 2 unbound from reality , sorry this analogy is failed to me."
Me : "What about higher-order..."
Friend : "No exception , the side who could to explain is you , just said higher-order thing is not elucidated the significant point that i said above , if the higher-order that take precedence over the lower-order of concept type 3 then it just type 3 with higher potency like what your said "
Me: "Yogiri exist in the begining and the end of...."
Friend : "No , other ones have omnipresent since the start and end of universe does is it transcended universe ? , I guess no , your can be embodied concept type 3 and exist in such statement which is omnipresent feat."
Me: " What the significant point did your said ?"
Friend: "It's a statement would prove analogy of concept like plato cave , a feats from ID is not shown it , if you wanna use analogy to prove your concept feat , it should better to use something in same kind of plato cave."
Me: Got only a silence.
Sorry for a long conversation , doesn't me or friend said it wrong ?
