It's also not nearly enough to accept this as rejected. I would like more staff input.If it's 5 against 4, that's not nearly enough agreement to change anything. You'd need a considerable staff support in order to push for some change. I'd argue that some of the people in the neutral list are also more along the lines of disagreement.
Three of four neutrals have implied or even stated they agree with a portion of the OP, but would like to be considered neutral, if they were leaning towards disagreement they would be in disagreement section.
This does not mean their word is absolute in any way, with respect.This is a matter of wiki policy. Bureaucrats are the highest authority on the site to decide which policies to implement. If all of them share the same opinion on something like this and when there is no overwhelming support on the other side, I'm afraid there's nothing much to do about it. Not to take anything away from staff members or even regular users, but ranks and authority are there for a reason.
I never once said this. This is what the opposition is doing if anything. I'm just asking for actual points to be made. I've removed portions of the OP which disagreed with me, and have accepted points going against what I would argue for. I do not like being considered unfair, and would never try to be such, please do not imply that I'm doing this for selfish reasons.You're asking people to either agree with you, or keep debating with you until they give up and agree with you. You just have to accept that not all things get accepted.
Once actual valid reasons for rejection are given, and they heavily outweigh the reasons of acceptance, I will gladly remove parts of the OP, like I have already.