• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Composite Tree CRT/Feature Request but its 2024

4,837
2,449
Time for another remaster of another popular composite back in the day, Composite Tree!

JBW is surprisingly fitting for the profile. It was a meme, the site is filled with jokes, Idk why people keep acting like we've "lost" the profile when we can still make matches on it.

Anyways... enough quirky comments and complaints. Time for some revisions.

Here's the new profile. And I want it looked over and confirmed by staff to see if it's ok to apply.

Also, here's the brand new analysis of the match ups on the profile that should be kept/removed. Any match that's a stomp should be removed. If the match outcome is largely unchanged despite the update profile, then the match stays.
  • v Composite Ant (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Stomp; The opponent is literally fighting a tree with 9-A durability. Also, the opponent of composite tree is too small to do meaningful damage to 1 tree)
  • v Composite Shark (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Stomp; same reasons from the Composite Ant)
  • v Patagotitan mayorum (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Stomp in favor of CT; in order to truly kill the tree, significant damage past what it's roots can survive needs to be done. And the tree has signfiicantly more size and mass to prevent this from a realistic perspective. Let's lax things out a bit and say that the Sauropod (who's closely related to Argentinosaurus) isn't far from the 8x one-shot range. (4 GJ minimum since Argentinosaurus are one of the heaviest sauropods). Even if the size and mass is sufficient enough to ignore the far smaller doses of poison, how is the dino going to get around the spikes and flammable oil of the tree? The dino might as well bleeds to death in the end before it could get to the tree's roots)
  • v Composite Cat (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Stomp; the composite cat profile is outdated and the strongest cat in IRL (the Tiger) has been downgraded to 9-C on VBW, even at baseline wall level AP for the outdated profile, CT has far better durability feats and is unable to be harmed by the cat. Composite tree outlasts or poisons the cat)
  • v T Rex (IRL) (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Stomp; same reasons from the Composite Ant)

YOU JUST LOST THE GAME

Yes. This mind game is stupid.
  • v The Game (Outcome: Should be inconclusive | Fairness: Even; CT pretty much has no abilities to counter "The Game's" immortality. And clonal colony pando has only been shown to live 80-90 thousand years if I remember correctly. The game can outlive CT.
    • On the other hand, the game can't make CT lose to it since it's not confirmed that trees do have minds. So it can't win)
  • v SCP 871 (Outcome: Same | Fairness: stomp for 871, possibly BFR wincon for CT (The only wincon for CT would be BFR, it does have plenty of time to move the cake out of the battlefield. However, our understanding on plant cognition is limited, so it's hard to say if the tree even has a mind at all to move the cake out of the battlefield as this wincon requires luck for it to work))
  • v CH (Outcome: N/A for both threads; needs a rematch (The current thread (and remind me if I missed something) said that CH can use napalm and CT can pierce/attack), like, can't CH just grab a plane and start napalming CT's forest and then finish the rest of CT's clones with their tech? Why does the more modern thread (that agreeably disagrees with the logic of the former thread) have to have incon votes? There should be a rematch/continuation of the debate, otherwise, the match with CH should technically be in the incon matches section in both of their respective profiles. Not to mention that CT also has more passive offensive capabilities than last time, and composite human has significantly more abilities and feats than back at 2019. In other words, the match is outdated)
  • v The Player (Minecraft) (Outcome: Same | Fairness: Same (The standard equipment of a minecraft player technically varies, Steve/Alex isn't always going to have milk on them at all times or may only have 1-2 buckets of milk, that's CT's potential wincon considering it's now versatile poison set. However, the minecraft player has a lot more versatile options at hand))
Question, is there a written/unwritten rule on JBW that there should be fair serious matches? I don't see any written rule on fair matches right now

Also, source of CT's current speed and lifting strength (before my remastered profile)? I can't seem to find the original (maybe credible) source of the old profile's current LS and speed. Otherwise, they should be replaced with the new speed and Lifting Strength ratings (which aren't far from different from the initial ones).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top