• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Chelshia Ability Additions

Jackythejack

They/Them
20,020
1,720
Very simple and straight forward.

Underwater Breathing (or whatever it's referred to on this wiki) because she herself states she has gills and she actively needs to have this because she can't swim yet stays long periods of time underwater

4th Wall Awareness (makes references to the fourth wall such as fan service)

Natural Weaponry (Most obvious one. Can morph her arm into an anchor.)

thats all I can think of atm
 
I mean for natural weaponry it's just a part of her basic abilities. For the other ones I could get scans for them it's just going to take a moment. I'm busy today but I know where to access the dialogue.

dunno why I'd make this up but sure
 
Are we really asking for scans for natural weaponry, which can literally be seen in her profile image, and underwater breathing, which her summary makes obvious?

4th wall awareness I can get asking for scans for, the rest are fine to apply regardless.
 
I think that's enough for 4th wall awareness to be considered an ability. I'm curious as to how it would help in a fight.
 
Jackythejack said:
Alright I'll do that in a bit. I'm at work and we're in a rush.
I got to say, a concluding evaluation needs to be done by Discussion Moderators, Administrators, or Bureaucrats for the threads to accepted. It is not the first time, I told you about that rule, @Jackythejack. You need to follow it.

Editing Rules:

  • Before making sweeping or significant changes to characters or verse pages, please start a thread in the Content Revision forum first, so that the suggestions may be evaluated by the Staff and the community at large, to ensure that they are acceptable. The concluding evaluations must be handled by Discussion Moderators, Administrators, or Bureaucrats, who should make an effort to base their evaluations on valid arguments, not personal opinions.
So, I will reversed the changes because the rule was not followed. To get the changes accepted then get agreeng concluding evaluation by Discussion Moderators, Administrators, or Bureaucrats.
 
These aren't significant changes. They're three minor abilities that'll likely never be relevant in a fight. A majority of people agreed, I have scans, and I've used common sense. I don't get why we need a whole bunch of staff members to comment on this.
 
Yeah these definitely aren't sweeping or significant.
 
This kind of stuff doesn't really need a CRT, just post like an imgur link in the justifications or post the scans on the file. They're also already evident by the file, so...

Anyway yeah its fine here's my official admin approval if you're gonna harp on that
 
The abilities are so minor. It's fine.
 
Thanks, I guess.

I thought these were minor enough to not matter which is why I didn't bother.
 
Dispite being a minor debater these changes arent all that significant It's not like the guy is trying too add plot manipulation or Law manipulation out of thse abilities
 
In my opinion, my minor changes can be hard to define as they can too subjective as I saw people being reported in rule violation for doing such changes that could qualifies as such.

Nonetheless, I will keep the topic in mind.
 
This seems fine and uncontroversial to apply.
 
not sure I NEED to look at this, since everyone's already approved, but

this looks fine

so there

I did the thing
 
@Jacky

No problem. This should definitely be fine to apply at this point.
 
So many posts in, and yet nobody noticed that this was in the wrong board.

smh
 
Back
Top