- 1,183
- 183
krillen (dbz) vs saitama
Saitama
krille
Saitama
krille
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Bald man vs bald man
- Thread starter Abscoolguy
- Start date
- 4,458
- 4,524
As with any battle with Saitama against high tier character's such as Krillin, I believe this is an inconclusive match, due to the fact that Saitama's true limits are unknown. This would include his durability, which Krillin's Destructo Disc has been shown to not negate (Teen Gohan and Jiren state so) so I vote inconclusive.
- 3,659
- 547
Krillin stomps. Saitama's full power can be calculated with the Boros fight. Since Saitama was stated to be serious in the fight, by both himself and a guide, we can conclude that Saitama was using 50% or more, meaning that Saitama would be large planet level +. Krillin in DBZ can be scaled to the same level of power during the Namek Saga, but he has gained an unidentifiable level of power over the Cell Saga, which would bring his power above Saitama's. This is disregarding the fact that 1. Krillin is a master martial artist and Saitama can't fight, 2. Krillin can utilize Chi Manipulation and Saitama can't, and 3. Krillin can fly and Saitama can't. I vote Krillin
- 4,458
- 4,524
@Mickey1940
You seem to completely ignore how it was made quite clear by both Boros and Saitama that his serious punch wasn't either his most powerful attack or at its most powerful when Saitama used it to defeat Boros.
Another thing is that we have no knowledge on how durable Saitama really is so to just assume that Krillin will instantly stomp is just poor judgment.
Also in fights like these, your mastery of a fighting style doesn't help to determine your victory unless your fighting style augments your power in some way. Which Krillin's clearly does not.
You seem to completely ignore how it was made quite clear by both Boros and Saitama that his serious punch wasn't either his most powerful attack or at its most powerful when Saitama used it to defeat Boros.
Another thing is that we have no knowledge on how durable Saitama really is so to just assume that Krillin will instantly stomp is just poor judgment.
Also in fights like these, your mastery of a fighting style doesn't help to determine your victory unless your fighting style augments your power in some way. Which Krillin's clearly does not.
- 3,659
- 547
You seem to completely ignore how it was made quite clear by both Boros and Saitama that his serious punch wasn't either his most powerful attack or at its most powerful when Saitama used it to defeat Boros.
Like I said, "Serious" means 50% or more. True, Saitama is not at full power, but since he used "Serious" in the attack name, AND a guide says that Saitama was clobbered a little, this implies that he used effort against Boros
Another thing is that we have no knowledge on how durable Saitama really is so to just assume that Krillin will instantly stomp is just poor judgment.
I'm assuming that Saitama's durability = his power, like DBZ characters. Also, Krillin can bypass his durability with Destructo Disc (since it can cut beings far stronger than the user)
Also in fights like these, your mastery of a fighting style doesn't help to determine your victory unless your fighting style augments your power in some way. Which Krillin's clearly does not.
Not true. Tell me, who wins: An extremily skilled martial artist who has been fighting for almost 20 years (and can SHOOT LAZER BEAMS AND LAZER DISCS AND FLY), or a guy who literally doesn't know how to fight. The martial artist clearly wins. Being a martial artist myself, I know exactly how that matchup would turn out. Hell, remember Goku vs Caulifla? Caulifla was actually stronger than Goku at the time, yet Goku was beating the shit out of her since he has several martial arts techniques that can outpace a street fighter like Caulifla. In this VS battle, it's even worse since Saitama has less EXP than Caulifla (only fought for 3-ish years), while Krillin's level of skill rival's Goku's.
Like I said, "Serious" means 50% or more. True, Saitama is not at full power, but since he used "Serious" in the attack name, AND a guide says that Saitama was clobbered a little, this implies that he used effort against Boros
Another thing is that we have no knowledge on how durable Saitama really is so to just assume that Krillin will instantly stomp is just poor judgment.
I'm assuming that Saitama's durability = his power, like DBZ characters. Also, Krillin can bypass his durability with Destructo Disc (since it can cut beings far stronger than the user)
Also in fights like these, your mastery of a fighting style doesn't help to determine your victory unless your fighting style augments your power in some way. Which Krillin's clearly does not.
Not true. Tell me, who wins: An extremily skilled martial artist who has been fighting for almost 20 years (and can SHOOT LAZER BEAMS AND LAZER DISCS AND FLY), or a guy who literally doesn't know how to fight. The martial artist clearly wins. Being a martial artist myself, I know exactly how that matchup would turn out. Hell, remember Goku vs Caulifla? Caulifla was actually stronger than Goku at the time, yet Goku was beating the shit out of her since he has several martial arts techniques that can outpace a street fighter like Caulifla. In this VS battle, it's even worse since Saitama has less EXP than Caulifla (only fought for 3-ish years), while Krillin's level of skill rival's Goku's.
- 3,659
- 547
His most consistent guidebook statements (and statements on Boros's attack) make him large planet level +. His most powerful statement is star level, but only 1 guide has said that, many more say planetary.
- 12,562
- 2,517
"Like I said, "Serious" means 50% or more. True, Saitama is not at full power, but since he used "Serious" in the attack name, AND a guide says that Saitama was clobbered a little, this implies that he used effort against Boros"
Just because it says 'serious' doesn't mean it's actually serious. Just like how Boros' attack can't actually collapse a star, at least according to this wiki. 'Serious' can mean anything from full power to slightly more serious than the other. Given statements like 'You had power to spare' and 'I never stood a chance', it's much more likely the latter.
To add to this, when Saitama fought Garou, not only was it obvious that Saitama was toying with him, he explicitly said 'I will show you a little bit of how serious I can be.' before using a serious series move.
You may be referring to another one here, but isn't the guide that said 'Saitama was a bit clobbered' also the same one with the Boros star busting feat?
Despite that... Saitama lost to Raditz who is equal to a Saibamen, who Krillin was able to one-shot. This is a stomp thread and should be closed.
Just because it says 'serious' doesn't mean it's actually serious. Just like how Boros' attack can't actually collapse a star, at least according to this wiki. 'Serious' can mean anything from full power to slightly more serious than the other. Given statements like 'You had power to spare' and 'I never stood a chance', it's much more likely the latter.
To add to this, when Saitama fought Garou, not only was it obvious that Saitama was toying with him, he explicitly said 'I will show you a little bit of how serious I can be.' before using a serious series move.
You may be referring to another one here, but isn't the guide that said 'Saitama was a bit clobbered' also the same one with the Boros star busting feat?
Despite that... Saitama lost to Raditz who is equal to a Saibamen, who Krillin was able to one-shot. This is a stomp thread and should be closed.
- 3,659
- 547
Yes, that was the guide I was using
GoldenScorpions
He/Him- 3,096
- 1,271
This fight already happened twice in the past, and Krillin won both times.
The end
The end
- 4,458
- 4,524
@ Mickey1940
The thing about the idea being a bit clobbered, is that a bit is not any definitive statement. In fact, it's extremely vague. ANd regarding the assumption that Saitama's durability, which again we have no definitive or concrete proof of, would be the same as his power, which we also have no real concrete proof of, is around how powerful he is because DBZ does the same thing is jumping to conclusions.
And regarding your statement about martial arts, Krillin's martial arts does not increase his attack potency, I don't know how to fight but I do know that the average guy can be the master of every single fighting style known to man but still not be able to punch a car in half. This entire fight is about how durable each fighter is and the power they can put behind an attack. Krillin's higher versatility doesn't help when his attacks can't get pass the opponent's durability.
This fight and Raditz is based on too many assumptions to have a clear, concise conclusion.
The thing about the idea being a bit clobbered, is that a bit is not any definitive statement. In fact, it's extremely vague. ANd regarding the assumption that Saitama's durability, which again we have no definitive or concrete proof of, would be the same as his power, which we also have no real concrete proof of, is around how powerful he is because DBZ does the same thing is jumping to conclusions.
And regarding your statement about martial arts, Krillin's martial arts does not increase his attack potency, I don't know how to fight but I do know that the average guy can be the master of every single fighting style known to man but still not be able to punch a car in half. This entire fight is about how durable each fighter is and the power they can put behind an attack. Krillin's higher versatility doesn't help when his attacks can't get pass the opponent's durability.
This fight and Raditz is based on too many assumptions to have a clear, concise conclusion.
- 61,177
- 14,747
- 4,458
- 4,524
I second that.WeeklyBattles said:
- 764
- 82
Krillin Via Durability and more variety
- 15,881
- 12,239
Krillin wins.
He's faster, can fly and fire ranged attacks which includes his Destructo Disc which can harm people more powerful than him and he can break it into multiple ones and catch Saitama off guard, slicing him into pieces.
He's faster, can fly and fire ranged attacks which includes his Destructo Disc which can harm people more powerful than him and he can break it into multiple ones and catch Saitama off guard, slicing him into pieces.
- 4,458
- 4,524
@LordGriffin1000
There is no way to prove that Krillin's destructo disc would get past Saitama's durability.
There is no way to prove that Krillin's destructo disc would get past Saitama's durability.
- 595
- 95
Krillin FRA.
- 20,084
- 10,871
Krillin blinds him with his baldness and wins.
- 15,881
- 12,239
- 1,183
- 183
- Thread starter
- #26
are people thinking of krillin in 4-c well he is in his 5-B form
- 1,183
- 183
- Thread starter
- #28
give me reasons pleaseHuesito88 said:
- 15,881
- 12,239
Krillin is 5-B but his Destructo Disc can harm people stronger than him. Not vastly stronger but much stronger.Abscoolguy said:
- 4,458
- 4,524
Last time I checked, Saitama is not Frieza so that argument won't work.LordGriffin1000 said:
- 4,458
- 4,524
The thing about that thread, if you actually read through it. It came down to wether Raditz could vaporize Saitama with a ki blast, whici in of itself doens't make sense. Yet that was the biggest supporting argument for Raditz someone could find, and once again we don't know Saitama's true durability or attack potency,Torlikoff said:
GoldenScorpions
He/Him- 3,096
- 1,271
That's not an argument. The fight is based on what we currently know of Saitama, and plenty of arguments have been placed saying why Krillin would win in the current situation.Duedate8898 said:
- 4,458
- 4,524
That's not an argument. The fight is based on what we currently know of Saitama, and plenty of arguments have been placed saying why Krillin would win in the current situation.GoldenScorpions said:
We know for sure that Saitama can destroy a planet, we know for sure that Saitama can move at at sub-relativistic speeds, we know for sure that Saitama can pick up the monster association base. We also know for sure that none of this is Saitama's best. We know for sure, we currently have no way to quantify any of Saitama's true capabilities. We can't simply assume that what we've seen as Saitama's best because we know it isn't. Those last two details cannot be ignored, because that assumes that what we've seen is Saitama's best.
- 3,659
- 547
About being clobbered a little, no matter what, it implies that Saitama took damage. Period. So since Boros is at most star level, then Saitama could be in the large star level to multi star level ranges, which Krillin is not far behind. In terms of martial arts, yes, martial arts does not increase attack potency, but if you put a master martial artist against a guy who doesn't actually know how to fight magainst each other with similar to equal stats, the martial artist wins 98% of the time. In terms of durability, I don't see how that's a problem, seeing how their stats are almost equal, and since his Destructo Disc is capable of cutting through beings far stronger than himself, like Nappa and Frieza.Duedate8898 said:
Similar threads
