- 8,851
- 5,685
It's fine, thanks for acknowledging the existence of my post.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Vs battles wiki pet peeves
- Thread starter Waka1979
- Start date
Bobsican
He/Him- 21,175
- 6,089
A "favorite" pet peeve of mine:
When a user claims to be a supporter, opponent or neutral to a verse but only knows tangentially about the series, if at all.
It really annoys me when I find a verse page where it's clear that most of the members only know as much of the verse as the wiki page summarizes them at most.
When a user claims to be a supporter, opponent or neutral to a verse but only knows tangentially about the series, if at all.
It really annoys me when I find a verse page where it's clear that most of the members only know as much of the verse as the wiki page summarizes them at most.
- 5,698
- 7,834
That's partly the reason why I don't add myself to those lists. I get they can be helpful and the intention is good however it's pretty arbitrary plus anyone can add themselves those lists making them come off as redundant.
If I'm knowledgeable about a verse and I believe I can add something constructive to the discussion then I'll join in myself.
Abu2411
He/Him- 1,361
- 626
Even worse is when they don't specify the type.
- 4,213
- 6,473
"I have acausality."
"Which type?"
"Yes."
"Which type?"
"Yes."
azontr
He/Him- 39,419
- 49,510
Another one:
People who make matches with absurdly haxxed characters such as (Archaon the Everchosen, Yakagi Suimei, Anos Voldigoad, Rimuru Tempest, Any Warhammer Fantasy character pretty much, DnD characters, Elder Scrolls characters) while putting them up against people they know have 0 chance of winning, to which they proceed to constantly change the opponent in hopes of finding somebody who can go up against monsters for no reason which is annoying.
People who make matches with absurdly haxxed characters such as (Archaon the Everchosen, Yakagi Suimei, Anos Voldigoad, Rimuru Tempest, Any Warhammer Fantasy character pretty much, DnD characters, Elder Scrolls characters) while putting them up against people they know have 0 chance of winning, to which they proceed to constantly change the opponent in hopes of finding somebody who can go up against monsters for no reason which is annoying.
- 5,698
- 7,834
Mood also Vs matches where both characters are under revisions and the OP is actually aware of it yet still posts the Vs thread anyway... :/
azontr
He/Him- 39,419
- 49,510
Yeah, that too lol
- 8,931
- 10,115
Starting to get tired of random people commenting "Obvious troll. Ban them/away" on the rule violations report thread. Why do they do it? Do they think they have authority on if someone should be banned or not for giving tier 0 to some random cartoon character nobody cares about? It grinded my gears when someone used that same line against a very helpful and contributing member of the wiki because of a mistake they made while editing a profile.
- 14,607
- 20,128
Profiles without summaries
- 3,042
- 3,145
No offense to anyone, but most of the time the people clogging up the RVR thread are just the same people all the time.
Valiant_Abyss
He/Him- 4,954
- 6,022
People who believe that simply responding to an argument is an automatic debunk that invalidates the argument. Dealing with these people in threads is so god damn annoying.
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 8,852
- 7,568
Bucko got you ****** up, huh?
I feel that.
I feel that.
Valiant_Abyss
He/Him- 4,954
- 6,022
"Yeah this sides argument makes more sense to me. I agree/disagree with X"
"But bro the argument is debunked because I replied to it a few times. You're just voting for no reason bro"
Please shut up.
"But bro the argument is debunked because I replied to it a few times. You're just voting for no reason bro"
Please shut up.
Last edited:
- 24,059
- 24,688
Based
XitSign
He/Him- 3,124
- 1,770
And when the person wants to keep debating you on that point but all the evidence has been laid out.
"Stop repeating yourself, debate me."
There's nothing else to say!!!
I'll admit I've caught myself doing this because I didn't realize me and the other person had fallen into this trap...
"Stop repeating yourself, debate me."
There's nothing else to say!!!
- 24,059
- 24,688
It's annoying how when a calc has multiple ends. And when a calc member evaluates it, they say it's fine without saying which end it is.
- 15,478
- 10,278
the text explaining the calc and all the multiples ends:
staff input: seems fine
- 3,764
- 2,170
Seeing as this has over 500 replies I ain't sure if somebody brought this up already, but posting good battles and having no one reply really annoys
Last edited:
- 15,478
- 10,278
Making CRTs to small verses/profiles and it never have comments
- 3,764
- 2,170
Bruh really just making any thread and getting no comments is a pain in the balls. Especially CRTs.
XSOULOFCINDERX
They/Them- 18,375
- 7,236
Amen.
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 8,852
- 7,568
sad pumpkin night fan noises
- 4,638
- 2,446
I always come to staff wall and call them to come to my thread,that's why my CRTs about minor additions are always real fast lol,the moment only one staff said "seems fine" (don't care if they read OP or not) everything is already done on their profiles kek (sometimes I don't even make CRT but still add minor additions because no one care about forgotten verses after all)
- 3,764
- 2,170
Yeah that helps. Sometimes at least
- 5,100
- 2,532
Yeah i gonna have to agree on that, is a ledser one but still bugs me, at least give like, a few more words then "no" or " "
EmilioRory10
He/Him- 925
- 1,125
Or when they close it saying that was already debunked without linking to the CRT where that was debunked, even if I completely disagree with the CRT they should at least link to 1 or 2 of those
- 3,764
- 2,170
Most of the time it feels like bias to me
- 5,698
- 7,834
I'm pretty sure this isn't just a VSBW pet peeve but it's pretty annoying whenever a new user instantly posts a CRT due a suspension of believe of the ratings of popular verses yet most if not all their issues would've been easily solved if they just read the verse page/blogs.
Totally not suspect that some folks know how to post a CRT while linking tags and images to it yet magically forget to read the verse page or just go to the Q&A threads.
- 3,042
- 3,145
I hate it when users can't form coherent sentences. Not talking about just minor grammatical errors, that's normal. I mean full on butchering the English language, third grade discord user-speak clusterfuck level of writing.
It makes discussions really difficult for multitudes of reasons.
It makes discussions really difficult for multitudes of reasons.
azontr
He/Him- 39,419
- 49,510
Dude this speaks to me on so many levels-
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,620
- 2,666
- 2,989
- 3,456
Similar threads
