This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
My main gripe is that Occam’s razor was used as a counter here, though, prior to my response of bringing it up, and it was alluded to several times by bringing up an economical amount of assumptions being preferable or somehow more meaningful. I'm saying that it's not, and almost all premises...
No, Occam's Razor was a statement by a friar about how it is futile to do more that which can be done with fewer. It is a philosophical razor intended for science, we are using it for fiction where explanations can be as complex and abstract as a writer wants them to be, and you have no way of...
There literally is nothing proveable here. Falsely equivocating heat with all types of energy because of a statement from a guy who only knows about internal military and governmental documents all based on one claim you ultimately cannot prove is something that should not be added to a profile...
I'd assume we just need a few feats calculated and some justifications changed, I am just arguing that I don’t think the Crimson Countess feat is usable for several varying reasons and I don't think it should be a possibly tier either. After that, I think everyone else can handle it since to me...
I am against it even having a possibly rating because I do not think there is even a possibility that the wiki should index. Assuming that a Supe being superior (i.e. the strongest, or bred to be the best, as the Legend says) does not mean that something that involves heat is weaker than...
What her dying from gunfire proves is that physicals =/= powers. But because of that, then the only means of comparing characters like Homelander to her is statements. Those statements do not refer to him or the Seven as being objectively stronger in every way. Here is an example.
In Devilman...
Still thumbs down on the Crimson Countess, we know superpowers can exceed the physicals of the characters. For example, the G-Whiz/Pre-Whiz kids when they were children physically but had superpowers such as acid capable of melting walls, the G-Men had that member who used her own power to melt...
yeah the dam thing is the big one
i feel like i went through some mandela effect stuff because i thought i remembered modern grenades being higher but thats only things meant to demolish buildings, although i wouldn't say it is fair to claim that because Billy and MM experienced burns that...
I do not have much time but I do not agree with scaling anyone to the Crimson Countess
Also worth noting Stormfront is roughly Seven tier and the Boys definitely scale to him, and also MM takes a grenade directly to the face (he did die afterward but that is because Billy suffocated him...
Best I know is Hulk's Gamma Crush from previous games since they are all canonically one Marvel earth. I have seen that feat get MHS+ but it would need to be calced properly probably. There may be other feats since I have not played many of Capcom's Marvel games.
I made the original thing and I'm not super certain how to reasonably proceed with scaling
Energy source in every game is refractors, I think that is all I've got regarding physicals and the storm creation scaling though. One refractor can act as a fuse which will stop a volcano from erupting...
Here's the deal: you can argue Bowser created something until you are blue in the face but it does not change the fact that the argument rests on special pleading, ignoring the original translation, cherrypicking the word "create" to only mean one thing it cannot possibly mean, using a joke from...
still doesnt follow, at best based on the translations we have he created the monsters in the forces which is consistent with what we know
id prefer speculation and attempts at using unfounded scifi nonsense stops and trying to actually defend the reason these were considered feats in the first...