This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact AKM sama if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
We need your help!
We need Patreon donations of at least 250 Euros per month for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive "Bronze Supporter", "Silver Supporter", "Gold Supporter", or "Diamond Supporter" badges that remove all advertisements in this forum, and give various other benefits above the Bronze tier, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
Mlle. Renom, I would appreciate it if you could weigh in on the ongoing Boros statement CRT since it would be changing how we translate CSRC, and you were part of the crew that approved Keplekey's translation 4 years ago.
You're familiar with the High 6-A translation and the subsequent ban on further translations. But Arc7 has revisited the databook and come up with a translation he says is more in line with the fan translations of other databook pages, something that we didn't have back in 2018.
And if you know any native Japanese speakers or otherwise fluent individuals, please let me know and I'll bring them onto the thread. Thank you very much!
“I personally don't think the feat breaks KE rules but that might be me having a problem with the rule as it is now in the first place
I never really advocated for the idea that idea that every KE feat needs to produce destruction on the same level to be useable, what I thought I agreed to was not using it if it's explicitly contradicted and can't be saved by the "fiction isn't always realistic" argument
(For the record the current rule comes from me trying to remove a previous rule and some other staff members arguing to revise it instead)”
Low Key, I agree. I’ve been thinking about making a thread like this.