- 64
- 20
That's why the option that the door was bent seems more accurate to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.In the drawing, you can see that a large part of the upper right section of the door is bent or broken, and the door appears deformed. However, when you look at the door on the floor, it still has that large crease, suggesting that it's probably just bent.
If it's broken, it would mean both panels are damaged, requiring a much greater force, right?
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.
Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.
Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.
Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.
Ngl you both make great points against each other. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some bending involved, because there just being a massive line through the corner of a steel door doesn't really make sense because otherwise that whole piece would've came off. And if Nikito's contention on what a line represents in terms of damage within the books is true, then why notNotice that in The Twisted Ones, on page 131, the door that the animatronics destroy is depicted with simple lines across it. The same thing happens with the destroyed furniture. On page 183 of Silver Eyes, when Carlton's father breaks the wall with the sledgehammer, the edges of the bricks on the floor are straight, when in reality they should be shattered.
So, analyzing the novels in general, it's clear that these are drawings that don't aim for realism or much detail. Now, it's impossible to know if the damage to the cubicle door is a crease or a break. Breaking is far superior to bending. What do you say? Should both possibilities be considered?
Since Bonnie was able to fragment the cubicle panels, it wouldn't be so far-fetched that he could break the door.
Ngl you both make great points against each other. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some bending involved, because there just being a massive line through the corner of a steel door doesn't really make sense because otherwise that whole piece would've came off. And if Nikito's contention on what a line represents in terms of damage within the books is true, then why not
Also the FNAF The Silver Eyes link you sent has a major infestation of p○rn ads (i f##king hate that website for it)Exactly, and thank you for considering my arguments. That's why I said it's most likely a crease. Because, as you said, if it were broken, the piece should detach.
The examples I used of other destroyed objects with the same lines on them are to illustrate how the details work in these drawings and why it's very likely that that line represents the door being violently bent.
Yes, I know, and I'm sorry. I'll try to find another site to view the novel. The first few times I visited that site, I didn't see that junk.Also the FNAF The Silver Eyes link you sent has a major infestation of p○rn ads (i f##king hate that website for it)
Well you do appear to be correct in terms of consistency. Though the match for bending a corner would be different as you'd need to measure it so I'll do that tomorrowThe Twisted Ones Graphic Novel Book 2 Fnaf Pages 1-50 - Flip PDF Download | FlipHTML5
Check Pages 1-50 of The Twisted Ones Graphic Novel Book 2 Fnaf in the flip PDF version. The Twisted Ones Graphic Novel Book 2 Fnaf was published by Jeff Oni on 2022-03-12. Find more similar flip PDFs like The Twisted Ones Graphic Novel Book 2 Fnaf. Download The Twisted Ones Graphic Novel Book 2...fliphtml5.com
On pages 102 and 147 of Silver Eyes and pages 47 and 48 of Twisted Ones, we can see these details again. In the case of the tables, those that are "better drawn," so to speak, have several lines to represent damage, with very few edges that are even slightly deformed.
By "better drawn," I mean that there is then a mix of lines of different colors and shapes, as if to represent pieces of other tables, etc.
I think that with this, we could confirm the mechanism of these lines and how they are used in the vast majority of cases to demonstrate clear damage to an object in a very simple way.
Well you do appear to be correct in terms of consistency. Though the match for bending a corner would be different as you'd need to measure it so I'll do that tomorrow
Hey it's no problem.Thank you so much
was waiting to see how long till you realizedGonna have to update the Freddy crushing Ralph calc (Mainly the Ribs+torso end) because it has occurred to my idiot self that he didn't crush the whole torso, but just as much as his arms could cover.
Updated it. The Ribcage is shorter than both of Freddy's forearm width's combined so the LS didn't change. What did change was the AP (Now its 221 Kilojoules), so a slight downgrade on the AP part but that's about it.was waiting to see how long till you realized
Updated it. The Ribcage is shorter than both of Freddy's forearm width's combined so the LS didn't change. What did chance was the AP (Now its 221 Kilojoules), so a slight downgrade on the AP part but that's about it.
There was a blog post for it a while back IIRC (I think the guy who made it had a username starting with a P or smth)do we have an ennard profile in the works?
i need that
go wildi see. well, if no one does it, I'll do it.
Who knows bro. But what I do know is that the Blob can get FNAF into tier 8 (and maybe even 7?) with some calcs. The tunnels it makes I think can get to tier 8, and if it affected the pizzaplex enough to cause an earthquake in one of the endings it can get to tier 7. I’m not as much sure about tier 7, since there is already a sinkhole under the pizzaplex, but IDK.honestly what the actual **** is the blob
I can also calc some blob feats such as the tunnels.Who knows bro. But what I do know is that the Blob can get FNAF into tier 8 (and maybe even 7?) with some calcs. The tunnels it makes I think can get to tier 8, and if it affected the pizzaplex enough to cause an earthquake in one of the endings it can get to tier 7. I’m not as much sure about tier 7, since there is already a sinkhole under the pizzaplex, but IDK.
I would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin didn't exploit any weaknesses (the reason Afton isn't 9-B is because it was a minigame, but this isnt the case here) and literally just beat the shit out of The Mimic. I'd be fine with that.I was thinking after The Mimic thread is concluded about doing a CRT making characters scale to Edwin's feat of breaking the mimic's legs with a Likely rating
Does that seem like a decent concept?
Yeah I think Edwin should get a straight up rating since the audio log feat is pretty blatantI would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin didn't exploit any weaknesses (the reason Afton isn't 9-B is because it was a minigame, but this isnt the case here) and literally just beat the shit out of The Mimic. I'd be fine with that.
I honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for himI would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin
I think most animatronics should scale to the Likely rating as wellI honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for him
cuz I find it weird that a random dude who besides that one singular feat, would just be around Human level at Best, outscales basically every animatronic and even one of the main antagonist itself which I feel like would **** up the scaling thing abit
Well that would just mean that The Mimic and possibly other animatronics upscales his current value and isn't confined to the ~1 megajoule value, while that value is used for HumansI honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for him
cuz I find it weird that a random dude who besides that one singular feat, would just be around Human level at Best, outscales basically every animatronic and even one of the main antagonist itself which I feel like would **** up the scaling thing abit
I'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.I think most animatronics should scale to the Likely rating as well
It's not like the durability changed aswell. If The Mimic fought back Edwin would have been cooked.Do have to remember The Mimic hadn't fought back against Edwin tho, it was still in a docile state as it was copying David
I'd be fine with the humans downscaling the current ~1 megajoule. The animatronics should also get a "likely higher" if not using the value with the mimic upscalingI'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.
I'm saying that I find it weird, that a guy who by all accounts, should be weaker than trained security guards, outscales everyone due to his rating not being likely.
tho if this does happen, ig I could honestly see him downscaling the value (but still be scaled to that calc) due to while yes, we do know that the mimic got his legs broken by edwin we don't know how severe the damage is.
and have the Trained Guards upscale from his downscaling and so on
Yeah it is a little awkward but without direct scaling can't really give the night guards a solid ratingI'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.
I'm saying that I find it weird, that a guy who by all accounts, should be weaker than trained security guards, outscales everyone due to his rating not being likely.
I think the fact the mimic had to make new legs for itself is enough to say the damage was pretty severetho if this does happen, ig I could honestly see him downscaling the value (but still be scaled to that calc) due to while yes, we do know that the mimic got his legs broken by edwin we don't know how severe the damage is.