• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fnaf at freddys discussion thread!

In the drawing, you can see that a large part of the upper right section of the door is bent or broken, and the door appears deformed. However, when you look at the door on the floor, it still has that large crease, suggesting that it's probably just bent.
If it's broken, it would mean both panels are damaged, requiring a much greater force, right?
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.

Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.
 
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.

Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.

The problem is that in the first scene, the door is seen head-on, and when it's on the ground, one of the panels from the novel covers almost the entire side of the door.
I completely agree that the white line is a reflection to emphasize that it's metallic.
Another thing to consider is that these are very simple drawings, honestly lacking much detail.
But that line clearly represents a crease caused by the brute force Bonnie exerted on it, and since he maintains that detail in both panels, it wasn't a random touch.
 
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.

Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.

In fact, I've noticed that most of the breaks or creases on objects in the FNAF novels are represented with lines, but the sides remain relatively straight.
Although, since they're simple drawings, it's understandable that they don't bother to emphasize those kinds of details, unfortunately.
 
The calculation above was made to account for the hollowness so it is assuming both panels are bent.

Also, that more or less appears to be a crack and the other crease could be lighting being reflected off of the door. The sides of the door also have no bends of angles. If the door was bent, then the sides wouldn't be straight lines.

Notice that in The Twisted Ones, on page 131, the door that the animatronics destroy is depicted with simple lines across it. The same thing happens with the destroyed furniture. On page 183 of Silver Eyes, when Carlton's father breaks the wall with the sledgehammer, the edges of the bricks on the floor are straight, when in reality they should be shattered.
So, analyzing the novels in general, it's clear that these are drawings that don't aim for realism or much detail. Now, it's impossible to know if the damage to the cubicle door is a crease or a break. Breaking is far superior to bending. What do you say? Should both possibilities be considered?
Since Bonnie was able to fragment the cubicle panels, it wouldn't be so far-fetched that he could break the door.
 
Notice that in The Twisted Ones, on page 131, the door that the animatronics destroy is depicted with simple lines across it. The same thing happens with the destroyed furniture. On page 183 of Silver Eyes, when Carlton's father breaks the wall with the sledgehammer, the edges of the bricks on the floor are straight, when in reality they should be shattered.
So, analyzing the novels in general, it's clear that these are drawings that don't aim for realism or much detail. Now, it's impossible to know if the damage to the cubicle door is a crease or a break. Breaking is far superior to bending. What do you say? Should both possibilities be considered?
Since Bonnie was able to fragment the cubicle panels, it wouldn't be so far-fetched that he could break the door.
Ngl you both make great points against each other. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some bending involved, because there just being a massive line through the corner of a steel door doesn't really make sense because otherwise that whole piece would've came off. And if Nikito's contention on what a line represents in terms of damage within the books is true, then why not
 
Ngl you both make great points against each other. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some bending involved, because there just being a massive line through the corner of a steel door doesn't really make sense because otherwise that whole piece would've came off. And if Nikito's contention on what a line represents in terms of damage within the books is true, then why not

Exactly, and thank you for considering my arguments. That's why I said it's most likely a crease. Because, as you said, if it were broken, the piece should detach.
The examples I used of other destroyed objects with the same lines on them are to illustrate how the details work in these drawings and why it's very likely that that line represents the door being violently bent.
 
Exactly, and thank you for considering my arguments. That's why I said it's most likely a crease. Because, as you said, if it were broken, the piece should detach.
The examples I used of other destroyed objects with the same lines on them are to illustrate how the details work in these drawings and why it's very likely that that line represents the door being violently bent.
Also the FNAF The Silver Eyes link you sent has a major infestation of p○rn ads (i f##king hate that website for it)
 
Also the FNAF The Silver Eyes link you sent has a major infestation of p○rn ads (i f##king hate that website for it)
Yes, I know, and I'm sorry. I'll try to find another site to view the novel. The first few times I visited that site, I didn't see that junk.
 


On pages 102 and 147 of Silver Eyes and pages 47 and 48 of Twisted Ones, we can see these details again. In the case of the tables, those that are "better drawn," so to speak, have several lines to represent damage, with very few edges that are even slightly deformed.
By "better drawn," I mean that there is then a mix of lines of different colors and shapes, as if to represent pieces of other tables, etc.
I think that with this, we could confirm the mechanism of these lines and how they are used in the vast majority of cases to demonstrate clear damage to an object in a very simple way.
 

On pages 102 and 147 of Silver Eyes and pages 47 and 48 of Twisted Ones, we can see these details again. In the case of the tables, those that are "better drawn," so to speak, have several lines to represent damage, with very few edges that are even slightly deformed.
By "better drawn," I mean that there is then a mix of lines of different colors and shapes, as if to represent pieces of other tables, etc.
I think that with this, we could confirm the mechanism of these lines and how they are used in the vast majority of cases to demonstrate clear damage to an object in a very simple way.
Well you do appear to be correct in terms of consistency. Though the match for bending a corner would be different as you'd need to measure it so I'll do that tomorrow
 
Gonna have to update the Freddy crushing Ralph calc (Mainly the Ribs+torso end) because it has occurred to my idiot self that he didn't crush the whole torso, but just as much as his arms could cover.
 
was waiting to see how long till you realized
Updated it. The Ribcage is shorter than both of Freddy's forearm width's combined so the LS didn't change. What did change was the AP (Now its 221 Kilojoules), so a slight downgrade on the AP part but that's about it.
 
Last edited:
Updated it. The Ribcage is shorter than both of Freddy's forearm width's combined so the LS didn't change. What did chance was the AP (Now its 221 Kilojoules), so a slight downgrade on the AP part but that's about it.

Wow, the result of that calculation is truly amazing. I didn't know crushing could reach such a high level.
A crushing feat of that magnitude can also be seen on page 45 of Week Before. It's explained that Bonnie crushes most of Ralph's body to fit him inside a suit with all the motors and servos.
While Bonnie is the one who performs this feat, Freddy, Chica, and Foxy could also do it, since in several Game Over scenes it's clarified that he's put inside a suit.
Another feat is on page 108. Bonnie destroys Ralph with such force and brutality that he leaves him as a mush scattered all over the hallway floor and the supply closet. The janitor on the next shift literally starts mopping it up.
I think a great example to visualize the state Ralph was left in would be the scene in Friday the 13th Part 6, when Jason murders a girl with his bare hands in the camp cabin and leaves her literally as a mush scattered all over the cabin.
We can also visualize Freddy's crushing hug feat in a similar way to how Jason crushes a man with a hug in Friday the 13th Part 9.
It's funny in a way, but I think those scenes are quite accurate in visualizing, as closely as possible, what those deaths in Week Before would look like.
 
Last edited:
Old Man yaoi
 
 
honestly what the actual **** is the blob
Who knows bro. But what I do know is that the Blob can get FNAF into tier 8 (and maybe even 7?) with some calcs. The tunnels it makes I think can get to tier 8, and if it affected the pizzaplex enough to cause an earthquake in one of the endings it can get to tier 7. I’m not as much sure about tier 7, since there is already a sinkhole under the pizzaplex, but IDK.
 
Who knows bro. But what I do know is that the Blob can get FNAF into tier 8 (and maybe even 7?) with some calcs. The tunnels it makes I think can get to tier 8, and if it affected the pizzaplex enough to cause an earthquake in one of the endings it can get to tier 7. I’m not as much sure about tier 7, since there is already a sinkhole under the pizzaplex, but IDK.
I can also calc some blob feats such as the tunnels.
 
I was thinking after The Mimic thread is concluded about doing a CRT making characters scale to Edwin's feat of breaking the mimic's legs with a Likely rating

Does that seem like a decent concept?
I would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin didn't exploit any weaknesses (the reason Afton isn't 9-B is because it was a minigame, but this isnt the case here) and literally just beat the shit out of The Mimic. I'd be fine with that.
 
I would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin didn't exploit any weaknesses (the reason Afton isn't 9-B is because it was a minigame, but this isnt the case here) and literally just beat the shit out of The Mimic. I'd be fine with that.
Yeah I think Edwin should get a straight up rating since the audio log feat is pretty blatant

The Likely rating part is for characters that would reasonably scale to his physicals, like Mike as Ruby brought up in the mimic thread
 
I would actually just give him the 9-B rating because we actually know Edwin
I honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for him

cuz I find it weird that a random dude who besides that one singular feat, would just be around Human level at Best, outscales basically every animatronic and even one of the main antagonist itself which I feel like would **** up the scaling thing abit
 
I honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for him

cuz I find it weird that a random dude who besides that one singular feat, would just be around Human level at Best, outscales basically every animatronic and even one of the main antagonist itself which I feel like would **** up the scaling thing abit
I think most animatronics should scale to the Likely rating as well

Using Mike as an example, the FNAF 1 animatronics are shown being able to stuff him into a suit with the game over screen
 
I honestly would prefer a possibly higher or possibly rating for him

cuz I find it weird that a random dude who besides that one singular feat, would just be around Human level at Best, outscales basically every animatronic and even one of the main antagonist itself which I feel like would **** up the scaling thing abit
Well that would just mean that The Mimic and possibly other animatronics upscales his current value and isn't confined to the ~1 megajoule value, while that value is used for Humans

We have atleast 6 instances throughout the series of a human beating an animatronic and actually hurting them (the FNaF 1 crew, Withered Freddy, and The Mimic), so it isn't inconsistant. Hell theres a Class 10 Mike Schmidt feat that got accepted so even the movie humans are superhuman by a good margin. The only reason Edwin is human level is because outside of beating the everloving f##k out of the mimic there is basically nothing.

The feat is pretty clear cut on what happened, so why limit the value to a possibly?
 
I think most animatronics should scale to the Likely rating as well
I'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.

I'm saying that I find it weird, that a guy who by all accounts, should be weaker than trained security guards, outscales everyone due to his rating not being likely.

tho if this does happen, ig I could honestly see him downscaling the value (but still be scaled to that calc) due to while yes, we do know that the mimic got his legs broken by edwin we don't know how severe the damage is.

and have the Trained Guards upscale from his downscaling and so on
 
Do have to remember The Mimic hadn't fought back against Edwin tho, it was still in a docile state as it was copying David
It's not like the durability changed aswell. If The Mimic fought back Edwin would have been cooked.
I'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.

I'm saying that I find it weird, that a guy who by all accounts, should be weaker than trained security guards, outscales everyone due to his rating not being likely.

tho if this does happen, ig I could honestly see him downscaling the value (but still be scaled to that calc) due to while yes, we do know that the mimic got his legs broken by edwin we don't know how severe the damage is.

and have the Trained Guards upscale from his downscaling and so on
I'd be fine with the humans downscaling the current ~1 megajoule. The animatronics should also get a "likely higher" if not using the value with the mimic upscaling
 
I'm not saying the the animatronics aren't also getting a likely scaling.

I'm saying that I find it weird, that a guy who by all accounts, should be weaker than trained security guards, outscales everyone due to his rating not being likely.
Yeah it is a little awkward but without direct scaling can't really give the night guards a solid rating

tho if this does happen, ig I could honestly see him downscaling the value (but still be scaled to that calc) due to while yes, we do know that the mimic got his legs broken by edwin we don't know how severe the damage is.
I think the fact the mimic had to make new legs for itself is enough to say the damage was pretty severe

if the mimic durability just comes from newton's third law being able to damage it should be enough

But yeah I think we're generally on the same page tho
 
Back
Top