• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Honkai: Star Rail Discussion Thread

Right i believe, it just every lord ravager have different view of philosphies in "destruction"

Phantylia (Destruction from inside)
=> love doing internal conflict
Zephyro (Destruction as art)
=> Love doing physical destruction
Celenova (Destruction as military)
=> Doing invasion as total conqueror with her anti matter legion
Irontomb (Intellectual Destruction)
=> Focus on destroying knowledge and technologies
Asat Pramad (Melancholic Destruction)
=> destroyed the world slowly and methodically so that its inhabitants would experience loss of hope then mock them
Archforger (Destruction as ?)
=> didn't know exactly what this dude view other than forging anything to be genocide weapons
Luxbane (Cosmic Destruction ig)
=> eating stars so the space and planets left in total darkness
Refer here
 
Totally unsure how reliable this place / person is so you'll have to recalc the feats but at least you can see their methodology and the feats they've used.

Also the Durandal feat shouldn't scale as the bubble world isn't actually that big and the stars are apparently just aesthetic.
(y)
Its said that they are like ornamental objects not that they just dont exist or are some pure visuals, I.E moon in salt and snow city was an giant salt that dipped into lake from sky while whatever looks like stars would likely be shining rocks instead
 
Ok i do have a question about path space. How big is it? Like phainon was destoying galaxies in path space
 
You can assume path space is the particularly as highest dimension in imaginary tree i believe, as you know... Aha "climb" To the peakest imaginary tree then able to see the entire void of cosmos.
 
Explicitly incorporeal
What I'm confused about is, if it's incorporeality, can destroying objects in a world like this produce energy for calculating attack potency? So what I mean is, if the world is a non-physical world, it means there is no mass that can be calculated, which means there is no energy produced, because there is no mass.

once again, i'm just asking not intending to deny anything
 
What I'm confused about is, if it's incorporeality, can destroying objects in a world like this produce energy for calculating attack potency? So what I mean is, if the world is a non-physical world, it means there is no mass that can be calculated, which means there is no energy produced, because there is no mass.

once again, i'm just asking not intending to deny anything
You can ask similar things for any tier 2 thing and above honestly
 
Back
Top