• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Sun God Nika vs The Six Paths Sage (Luffy vs Naruto).

Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually read the pages.

The grace was null due to a chunk of votes not fitting our standards and lacking reasons for the votes. There were a bunch of votes of people just saying "Naruto got it"
I'm not reading the fifteen pages of stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense past grace concluding.

Huh? Since when do you get to arbitrarily decide whether or not someone's vote is valid?
 
I'm not reading the fifteen pages of stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense past grace concluding.
Yeah, read the last 4.
Maybe a page of the last 30 was offtopic. Nothing was stonewalling, you just show you didn't read shit.
Huh? Since when do you get to arbitrarily decide whether or not someone's vote is valid?

Deciding a Winner

The winner will be determined by the side having better constructive arguments, rather than one-word/one-sentence votes, which will be disregarded. However, one-word/one-sentence votes agreeing with another member's reasoning will be accepted as valid votes.
For those who said "Luffy/Naruto FRA", these are fine.
For those who said "Luffy got it/Naruto slams/vote for Luffy/vote for Naruto" for no reasons, their votes are not counted.
 
Yeah, read the last 4.
Maybe a page of the last 30 was offtopic. Nothing was stonewalling, you just show you didn't read shit.


For those who said "Luffy/Naruto FRA", these are fine.
For those who said "Luffy got it/Naruto slams/vote for Luffy/vote for Naruto" for no reasons, their votes are not counted.
Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.

Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
 
Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.
When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.

Me saying you didn't read shit isn't rule breaking. It's the truth. You didn't read shit.
Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
Yes
 
Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.

Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
Bro this isn't reddit you're not a mod here stop with this royalty ahh comment
 
Most of the votes I've seen have contained either arguments or "FRA", which are both valid. If we're saying that a large portion of the votes are invalid, then that needs to be proven.
it was already proven before... It was around 3 or more for naruto and maybe 1 for luffy, either way it's a fact that there were invalid votes
 
KT, you need to say it with incredible imperialism-- I mean a british way of speaking, that may be more polite for such a refined taste!
 
When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.

Me saying you didn't read shit isn't rule breaking. It's the truth. You didn't read shit.

Yes
I'd recommend we conclude this with incon match.
 
I'd agree with incon.
84bc90f34b68.webp
 
When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.

Me saying you didn't read shit isn't rule breaking. It's the truth. You didn't read shit.

Yes
I never read the pages past grace which I made clear in my post, so how you think I directed that at anyone in particular is beyond me. If that post felt personal or insultive then I apologize. Either way, your job is to "calm down discussions that have gone out of hand" and "maintain a congenial atmosphere within the wiki", which is the exact opposite of a needlessly aggressive post like "you didn't read shit."

Where were these new votes tallied? Can you link it please?
 
I never read the pages past grace which I made clear in my post, so how you think I directed that at anyone in particular is beyond me. If that post felt personal or insultive then I apologize. Either way, your job is to "calm down discussions that have gone out of hand" and "maintain a congenial atmosphere within the wiki", which is the exact opposite of a needlessly aggressive post like "you didn't read shit."
Understood. I apologize.
Where were these new votes tallied? Can you link it please?
Grace was entered again later in the day, so we're currently in grace, but we haven't went "past grace".
I'd recommend we conclude this with incon match.
I'm not against it
 
How many votes for each?
34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)
34-36 at 02:11 (Aytugsss Vote)
34-37 at 02:26 (Excellence616 Vote Grace)
35-37 at 02:56 (SlendVeny Cancelled Grace)
36-37 at 08:10 (Viott Vote)
36-38 at 10:51 (GG55HH Vote)
36-39 at 11:22 (Richardo908 Grace)
36-40 at 12:29 (Xdsagecat Vote)
37-40 at 12:50 (Theuser789 Vote)

Currently it's 37-40, the borderline voting limit for grace
 
Correct me if i am wrong but, hasn't it been days since the creation of this thread?

Iirc, there's a rule saying that if both sides cannot reach grace due to not reaching a concensus

The match will be inconclusive?
 
34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)
34-36 at 02:11 (Aytugsss Vote)
34-37 at 02:26 (Excellence616 Vote Grace)
35-37 at 02:56 (SlendVeny Cancelled Grace)
36-37 at 08:10 (Viott Vote)
36-38 at 10:51 (GG55HH Vote)
36-39 at 11:22 (Richardo908 Grace)
36-40 at 12:29 (Xdsagecat Vote)
37-40 at 12:50 (Theuser789 Vote)

Currently it's 37-40, the borderline voting limit for grace
Slendveny voted before excellence so it was already counted, and i’m unsure if users who clarified their vote later on should have it removed.

Anyways, this match is bunk, i don’t mind it being added as incon. I lowkey don’t have interest in this anymore.
 
Slendveny voted before excellence so it was already counted, and i’m unsure if users who clarified their vote later on should have it removed.
Thank you then
Anyways, this match is bunk, i don’t mind it being added as incon. I lowkey don’t have interest in this anymore.
One Piece is in revisions anyways so the match is gonna be removed, but like, incon works ig
 
What if I vote fra on Luffy, will this be counted as vote and making the matchup incon?
 
Yeahh at this stage its probably a lot cleaner to just leave it at Incon if both sides are gonna come swinging with new FRA dumps to keep flipping it one side or another
 
Both sides have made reasonable arguments and this thread is bloated and doesn't really seem to be going anywhere, so I'll also change my vote to incon.
 
voting for incon. I saw some interesting arguments on the first pages but overall it was just a ton of circular reasoning regarding precognition of all things. Btw, shouldn't the OP have specified if there's equalization between haki and chakra?
 
34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)
34-36 at 02:11 (Aytugsss Vote)
34-37 at 02:26 (Excellence616 Vote Grace)
35-37 at 02:56 (SlendVeny Cancelled Grace)
36-37 at 08:10 (Viott Vote)
36-38 at 10:51 (GG55HH Vote)
36-39 at 11:22 (Richardo908 Grace)
36-40 at 12:29 (Xdsagecat Vote)
37-40 at 12:50 (Theuser789 Vote)

Currently it's 37-40, the borderline voting limit for grace
İ vote it in the first pages but i just dont do it with the rules
İm saying it because they include me before and just want make sure i wasnt vote two times
Or did you guys cancel my first vote?
 
İ vote it in the first pages but i just dont do it with the rules
İm saying it because they include me before and just want make sure i wasnt vote two times
Or did you guys cancel my first vote?
it wasn't counted cause you didn't say FRA or give any reasons, it's counted fully now
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top