Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not reading the fifteen pages of stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense past grace concluding.Actually read the pages.
The grace was null due to a chunk of votes not fitting our standards and lacking reasons for the votes. There were a bunch of votes of people just saying "Naruto got it"
Yeah, read the last 4.I'm not reading the fifteen pages of stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense past grace concluding.
Huh? Since when do you get to arbitrarily decide whether or not someone's vote is valid?
For those who said "Luffy/Naruto FRA", these are fine.Deciding a Winner
The winner will be determined by the side having better constructive arguments, rather than one-word/one-sentence votes, which will be disregarded. However, one-word/one-sentence votes agreeing with another member's reasoning will be accepted as valid votes.
bro has been on vsbw since 2020, VSB matches has basically always followed the rules of valid vote counts. Idk if you're trying to be ignorant or whatHuh? Since when do you get to arbitrarily decide whether or not someone's vote is valid?
Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.Yeah, read the last 4.
Maybe a page of the last 30 was offtopic. Nothing was stonewalling, you just show you didn't read shit.
![]()
Versus Thread Rules
The VS Battles Wiki is mainly a site that attempts to index the statistics of characters across many different fictional franchises. However, as the site name implies, we also allow our members to pit fictional characters against each other in hypothetical matchups for entertainment purposes...vsbattles.fandom.com
For those who said "Luffy/Naruto FRA", these are fine.
For those who said "Luffy got it/Naruto slams/vote for Luffy/vote for Naruto" for no reasons, their votes are not counted.
feels the auraWatch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.
Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
Most of the votes I've seen have contained either arguments or "FRA", which are both valid. If we're saying that a large portion of the votes are invalid, then that needs to be proven.bro has been on vsbw since 2020, VSB matches has basically always followed the rules of valid vote counts. Idk if you're trying to be ignorant or whatthis isn't something new it's managed in every vs thread
When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.
YesHas someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
Bro this isn't reddit you're not a mod here stop with this royalty ahh commentWatch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.
Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
it was already proven before... It was around 3 or more for naruto and maybe 1 for luffy, either way it's a fact that there were invalid votesMost of the votes I've seen have contained either arguments or "FRA", which are both valid. If we're saying that a large portion of the votes are invalid, then that needs to be proven.
KT, you need to say it with incredible imperialism-- I mean a british way of speaking, that may be more polite for such a refined taste!
I'd recommend we conclude this with incon match.When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.
Me saying you didn't read shit isn't rule breaking. It's the truth. You didn't read shit.
Yes
Watch your tone, there's no reason for a thread moderator to speak to me or anyone like that, your job is to reduce toxicity, not incite it.
Has someone actually tallied the votes with this in mind?
All I need to see folksPrivated Profile
Not until page 50I'd recommend we conclude this with incon match.
I never read the pages past grace which I made clear in my post, so how you think I directed that at anyone in particular is beyond me. If that post felt personal or insultive then I apologize. Either way, your job is to "calm down discussions that have gone out of hand" and "maintain a congenial atmosphere within the wiki", which is the exact opposite of a needlessly aggressive post like "you didn't read shit."When you appear out of nowhere and say that our efforts to argue are the equivalent of "stonewalling, trolling and off-topic nonsense" minimizing the hours of arguments we've had to yell at people who flat out ignored profiles for one side and there was genuine argumentation for at least 30 pages, you can be spoken to in any way that isn't rule breaking.
Me saying you didn't read shit isn't rule breaking. It's the truth. You didn't read shit.
Yes
Understood. I apologize.I never read the pages past grace which I made clear in my post, so how you think I directed that at anyone in particular is beyond me. If that post felt personal or insultive then I apologize. Either way, your job is to "calm down discussions that have gone out of hand" and "maintain a congenial atmosphere within the wiki", which is the exact opposite of a needlessly aggressive post like "you didn't read shit."
Where were these new votes tallied? Can you link it please?
I'm not against itI'd recommend we conclude this with incon match.
Thank you.Grace was entered again later in the day, so we're currently in grace, but we haven't went "past grace".![]()
The Sun God Nika vs The Six Paths Sage (Luffy vs Naruto).
scrap @karo_senpaii. He actively argued his case with over 10 messages. He even gave a reasoning before voting you having funvsbattles.com
34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)How many votes for each?
Slendveny voted before excellence so it was already counted, and i’m unsure if users who clarified their vote later on should have it removed.34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)
34-36 at 02:11 (Aytugsss Vote)
34-37 at 02:26 (Excellence616 Vote Grace)
35-37 at 02:56 (SlendVeny Cancelled Grace)
36-37 at 08:10 (Viott Vote)
36-38 at 10:51 (GG55HH Vote)
36-39 at 11:22 (Richardo908 Grace)
36-40 at 12:29 (Xdsagecat Vote)
37-40 at 12:50 (Theuser789 Vote)
Currently it's 37-40, the borderline voting limit for grace
Thank you thenSlendveny voted before excellence so it was already counted, and i’m unsure if users who clarified their vote later on should have it removed.
One Piece is in revisions anyways so the match is gonna be removed, but like, incon works igAnyways, this match is bunk, i don’t mind it being added as incon. I lowkey don’t have interest in this anymore.
Isn't it always in revisions tho?One Piece is in revisions anyways so the match is gonna be removed, but like, incon works ig
Yup.Isn't it always in revisions tho?
What if I vote fra on Luffy, will this be counted as vote and making the matchup incon?
Grace for Luffy has started
İ vote it in the first pages but i just dont do it with the rules34-35 at 01:25 (Re-Tally)
34-36 at 02:11 (Aytugsss Vote)
34-37 at 02:26 (Excellence616 Vote Grace)
35-37 at 02:56 (SlendVeny Cancelled Grace)
36-37 at 08:10 (Viott Vote)
36-38 at 10:51 (GG55HH Vote)
36-39 at 11:22 (Richardo908 Grace)
36-40 at 12:29 (Xdsagecat Vote)
37-40 at 12:50 (Theuser789 Vote)
Currently it's 37-40, the borderline voting limit for grace
it wasn't counted cause you didn't say FRA or give any reasons, it's counted fully nowİ vote it in the first pages but i just dont do it with the rules
İm saying it because they include me before and just want make sure i wasnt vote two times
Or did you guys cancel my first vote?