- 324
- 313
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
One Piece General Discussion: Elbaph
- Thread starter KingTempest
- Start date
-
- Tags
- one piece
Stefano4444
He/Him- 6,812
- 6,060
Nice, assuming it get accepted even if we lowball with .33 end, we still end up with the results within the Exatons range.
(6)+6.399+1.33×log10((2,476,085÷110)×((2×π)÷360)) = 15.8493
10^(1.5×(15.8493)+4.8) = 3.74929834e+28 Joules = 8.96096046 Exatons of TNT aka Multi-Continent level.
Last edited:
- 324
- 313
Honestly, using any value below 1.66 doesn't make much sense as all evidence point towards a value of ≥1.66 I'd be surprised if we come to an exact value above 1.66, I'm just fine with using the original value.
- 324
- 313
Would we be able to get a reasonable LS value for Luffy using the method done here for Star and Stripe?
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,205
This method is currently being removed
- 1,152
- 456
Why?
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,207
Expanding the Lifting Strength page
This is the current content of the Lifting Strength page: Lifting Strength is defined as the mass that an individual can lift on Earth. In other words, it measures the amount of upward force a character can produce. As such, pushing and pulling feats are also considered part of this statistic...
- 1,152
- 456
Does Luffy have a similar feat to this?
- 324
- 313
Yea, he does one here but I guess the method is no longer viable.
- 20,560
- 15,222
I believe it would work when Luffy was carrying a whole sack of food and jumped out of the way from a laser but that calc leads to FTL results, so gg
- 63
- 29
If the Enies Lobby hole was created via a similar method aka another usage of an ancient weapon, then couldn't you also do the same calculation but with T being 800 years to get another possible vaporization feat?
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,212
Keyword, if. Since we can’t prove it we aren’t able to use it
- 63
- 29
Of course thats a given, I dont expect this to be used or applied in anything. I only said it because I know he did a potential destruction of Alabasta calc, so why not for Enies Lobby. Especially when we might get more context later on and then it might be applicable.
Also bro just wanted to point out incase you missed it, the plate count of 6140 that you got is slightly wrong because of typos I think, like the g should be 124 not 8.9 and Q is off by a 100, etc. The total count I think still balances out at 6185 or so.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,214
???????
- 63
- 29
Its for the OP World plate calculations that you were working on.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,216
How did you even see that
- 63
- 29
I got these psychic powers you see, I can send parts of my spirit and they fetch me information. Then they show me these visions and thats how I saw it.
Jokes aside I just read it on your page wat u mean.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,218
-_-
- 324
- 313
- 324
- 313
800 years might be a stretch and possibly result in a depth greater than the diameter of the planet, which wouldn't be possible.
- 63
- 29
In the case that the depth becomes too large cant we limit it to the distance from the surface to the core of the planet or a bit above that? That way we can at least get a more accurate value for it.
I mean Enies Lobby for sure hasn't been filled for 2 years. We can do at least that much right?
- 324
- 313
Let's assume a hole width of 2 km.
That gives an area of 3,141,593 m^2.
Using a velocity of 9.81 m/s.
3,141,593 * 9.81 = 30,819,027.33 m^3/s
30,819,027.33 * 25,246,080,000 = 778,059,629,495,366,400 m^3
Height = Volume/Area
778,059,629,495,366,400/3,141,593 = 247,664,044,800 m = 247,664,044.8 km
Current Blue diameter is 1,576,323.92381 km.
Lets do one for 2 years.
30,819,027.33 * 63,115,200 = 1,945,149,073,738,416 m^3 = 1.945149073738416×10^21 cm^3
1,945,149,073,738,416/3,141,593 = 619,160,112 m = 619,160.112 km
(1.945149073738416×10^21) * (25,700) = 4.999 × 10^25 Joules = 11.95 Petatons of TNT (Multi-Continental)
Possibly higher depending on the width of the hole.
- 23,394
- 21,128
24 years minimum, as that's when Tom was originally sentenced to be sent to Enies Lobby to be executed.
- 324
- 313
In that case...
3,141,593 * 9.81 = 30,819,027.33
30,819,027.33 * 757,382,400 = 23,341,788,884,860,990 m^3
23,341,788,884,860,990/3,141,593 = 7,429,921,344 m = 7,429,921.344 km
Again, beyond the diameter of the planet. Damn...
The only way I can see these working if the water isn't in a perfect cylinder, such as underground rivers and caves or possibly being evaporated by the planet's intense heat near the core.
- 63
- 29
Frustrating it seems. Anything higher than 2 years will run into the same issue.
Its still okay since the other effects would increase the total output but still.
- 324
- 313
I made this for shaking the planet just in case this thread goes through. Better to be prepared than not.
- 63
- 29
Agreed Mag 6 is too low, its likely higher than Mag 8 but that should be the minimum. However thread isn't getting traction yet which is the issue.
- 324
- 313
Just gotta play the waiting game until CGMs decide to look it over.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,229
Mag 7 is accepted
- 63
- 29
Is that for WB or the MF, or both? Its still too low for WB.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,231
For Whitebeard. Mag 7 is perfectly fine for a lowball we do not need anything crazy for him
- 63
- 29
I see thanks.
All Im saying is that this will be revised anyway when we start seeing BB actually use his power later, but guess we gotta wait
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,233
yeah this is fairI see thanks.
All Im saying is that this will be revised anyway when we start seeing BB actually use his power later, but guess we gotta wait
- 324
- 313
Would we have to create new scaling chains for the values above Mag 6 from here (if accepted), or would the previous ~188 Exatons just be replaced by 5.307 Zettatons (Mag 7 for example) and all the multipliers/scaling remain the same?
Ex: Scabbards scaling to 1/4 of 5.307 Zettatons at 1.3 Zettatons. Instead of ~188 Exatons down to ~47 Exatons.
Ex: Scabbards scaling to 1/4 of 5.307 Zettatons at 1.3 Zettatons. Instead of ~188 Exatons down to ~47 Exatons.
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,235
Yeah (the latter)
- 324
- 313
What Mag for the Mother Flame do you think is reasonable?
- 24,306
- 37,730
- Thread starter
- #43,237
i blatantly calced the magnitude for the mother flame it was 11.6868517619
- 324
- 313
Isn't that only for the tsunami method?Also, Floxy seems to agree with my reasoning that we should also use the worldwide planet shaking for the MF. The only part he disagreed with is the formula used and the attenuation value.
- 63
- 29
Shouldn't the MF be greater since it was higher than any in recent history, why assume both are the same?
- 324
- 313
My assumption is that the one from WB/BB would be a Mag 8 and the one from the MF would be Mag 10. Satisfying both statements of "power to destroy the world" and "No earthquake in recorded history matched the one felt that day."
