- 13,826
- 19,646
But his main account is still left unbanned by AKM, the one banned him?If you look at their account, they are currently banned for being an alt.
Anyway - in regards to this thread, I'm still neutral for now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But his main account is still left unbanned by AKM, the one banned him?If you look at their account, they are currently banned for being an alt.
Anyway - in regards to this thread, I'm still neutral for now.
I don't know the details of it. It's been brought up in the RVT so I recommend all further discussion of it continue there and not here.But his main account is still left unbanned by AKM, the one banned him?
The Reality of Gremmy’s Creations
Gremmy has the ability to bring into reality whatever he imagines, his creations are real and factual.
He has created a variety of things, all of which function exactly on par with or even better than their real-world counterparts. Even ignoring their greater potency, their functionality at core is identical to the real thing.
This is where Kubo’s genius shines. He meticulously included details such as:
- His water, was real water, we can see the detail of Zaraki struggling to breath air.
- His meteor displayed the classic ablation effect, as it entered the atmosphere—just like a real meteor.
- His guns and missiles functioned as actual firearms, with internal mechanical compositions.
So, Unless Gremmy is secretly a mechanical engineer and scientist as well, the only explanation is that The Visionary creates objects following their real life counterpart structure.
- The meteor’s ablation effect showing atmospheric entry.
- The missile’s interior mechanics, proving it had a real mechanical composition rather than being an empty shell.
Why, all of a sudden, would outer space be the exception?
If Kubo took the time, to show that even a missile had its proper internal mechanics or the metero had an ablation effect, then why wouldn’t outer space—which was created with visible stars as details—be real as well?
Why would Narita, the novel author, even highlight that Gremmy was amazing because he could even create outer space if this was just not a real thing?
Outer space is an incredibly complex concept, and in our universe, everything exists and functions for a reason, it was created in a specific way.
So if Gremmy decided to create an outer space with stars, then it exists as such with it's details and properties. If he had wanted, he could have created something entirely different instead.
- Stars drive away gas and particles through intense radiation and stellar winds, originating from the process of the universe's formation, which was initially filled with gas. This also prevents an atmosphere from forming in open space. Even gravity would behave differently under these conditions, it is all linked.
The Burden of Proof
So once again, I am asking for evidence, just as I did in the outlier discussion.
If anyone claims that Gremmy’s outer space and stars don't follow real life counter part structure, they need to provide evidences to support that assertion, proving why they don't follow real life counter part structure.
Don't assume it, unless he specifically clarify.leaning towards disagreeing, probably
Don't assume it, unless he specifically clarify.
I'll have my post out here Saturday.@Deceived3596 said he'd get his response out sometime this week, so maybe we can expect a response from him this weekend
Don't be selfish.So, seeing as my pupil (factual, don’t ask him) has been banned, I’m the new self-appointed OP until the situation clears up.
For the newly tagged staff, this is the current state of the argumentation. There is a previous post by my goat Lephyr "summarizing" the arguments made before.
Current state: The opposition seems to have conceded the Outlier arguments (if y’all haven’t, just reply with your arguments again, although most arguments and counterarguments are in Lephyr’s post). The debate now hinges on whether these creations are true in the sense of "As for the questions themselves, I want to formulate them better before I start asking them. They'll essentially be about why the stars we see are actual stars, with the same energy requirements as an actual star. And a more Metaphysical question about Gremmy's Imagination not necessarily being equivalent with Reality."
Since this is mainly Deceived’s argument, I don’t want to misrepresent him. Also, he hasn’t been able to expand on his full claim/argument due to personal circumstances. If what has been presented so far doesn’t convince you one way or another, you can wait for his post addressing his argument in the near future.
Arguments against this claim of the opposition are as follows. Keep in mind that, since we don’t have the opposition’s full argument, the counterarguments are also subject to change or expansion.)
Current vote:
Staff:
LephyrTheRevanchist and Reiner04 agree with all of the OP.
Damage3245 is currently neutral.
Duedate8898 disagrees (since he disagreed a while ago and the discussion has evolved a lot in the pages since, I’d implore him to give updated reasons for his disagreement, though he’s within his rights not to, and his vote is valid).
Notable, well-versed non-staff of the verse:
Arc7Kuroi fully agrees with the OP.
Hellscream fully agrees with the OP.
I, myself (Humble), fully agree (open to counterarguments and disagreements, also waiting on Deceived to go in-depth, but based on the evidence so far and my own reading/watching, I am mostly sure in my agreement).
Deceived3596, as stated before, disagrees and is preparing his counterarguments.
Arc and Deceived are kind of the two GOATs of the verse, and since one agrees and the other disagrees, please give both sides the benefit of the doubt and engage with/consider both arguments.
Yeah I said I’ll do that if it gets accepted a few pages ago, which I could just tell you cuz we’re in vc rn, but uhhhhhhA thread should be made right after this one to address this concern before we start applying additional ratings.
...but uhhhhhh![]()
What's the state of the votes?I'm still neutral until the whole scaling situation gets resolved, but I'm leaning towards being okay with a "up to 4-A Creation with Visionary" for Gremmy - it's the scaling of that directly to Kenpachi or others that has me dubious.
Same as stated in the OP. @Nierre has yet to comment, as he mentioned he would do so after evaluating deceived opinion on it.What's the state of the votes?
We shall see, the next thread will be to discuss who if anyone scales. No need to clog up this thread asking questions we won’t know the answer to until next thread thoIf this gets accepted, can Yamamoto gain a tier jump in a following up thread?
We shall see, the next thread will be to discuss who if anyone scales. No need to clog up this thread asking questions we won’t know the answer to until next thread tho
I just finished my conversation with Arc and we had a fruitful discussion about my issues with the feat. After careful consideration, I'm fine with the 4-A rating existing within the context of the site. There is enough evidence supporting the rating as laid out by many others, much more compared to some other prominent feats of this type, and we allow the assumptions made with them about their composition and dimensions to exist without issue. It would be pretty hypocritical to have strict standards for Bleach, but no other verse that has similar feats are beholden to it.
Now, I may have some potential disagreements with the feat aside from the ones I discussed previously, or alluded to before, but those don't currently dissuade my opinion on how it should be categorized on site. If my opinion changes, and I find myself believing those potential issues provide a symmetry breaker between Gremmy's feat and others of its type, that would require it to be removed, I will remove it personally.
Before ending my post though: I do believe after this thread is completed, and if the rating is accepted and applied, we must figure who exactly scales to it. A thread should be made right after this one to address this concern before we start applying additional ratings. I don't want to have a situation where we're applying ratings to characters without sufficient proof of them actually scaling to it.
So, to end my post; while I may have some personal hangups with the feat, and they might eventually change my opinion on this, I don't believe they're prominent or logically developed enough to dissuade me from saying the feat should probably be accepted as a full rating, as other feats like it have been applied as, with inferior evidence supporting the conclusion.
Well, at this point, we've reached the compromise of making Gremmy 4-A and leaving the scaling for other characters for the next CRT. This means that out of the proposed OP, only Gremmy will receive changes in this CRT, while the rest like Kenny, Toshiro, and Gerard will be left for the next CRT that Arc will make, where we’ll see if they scale at all and if they do, who else scales via them, if anyone.So what do we do now?
Yes.I can apply the change; I've had it prepared for almost a week
Although, just to be sure before doing it, there are three who agree, one neutral, and one who disagrees. Is that enough?
Already sent Arc a DM, as it's easier and faster to have the conversation through Discord.what's the draft for Gremmy's justification?
And yes, majority agrees is all that's needed with 3 agrees required for controversial threads like this.