• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Just a simple tier 1 Question.

Could this possibly be reach low 1-A
I mean it just says the dimensions of the universe which could simply be 4D, but conceptually transcending the concept of dimensionality also implies all possible dimensions so, in fact, this may be granted 1-A unless there are counterarguments to my reasoning.

One I could see is the concept of dimensionality needing more context, I guess. And another could be that the whole argument is solely backed up by an author statement.
 
Being above the concept of dimension is Low 1-A by default. With more context it can be 1-A.
 
Idk wtf this scan is but it's invalid

oEip820.png
 
So many verse uses author's msg too.
 
They aren't inherently invalid but when you see someone basically ask "IS IT TRUE HE TRANSCEND THE CONCEPT OF DIMENSIONS" then that's obviously something we cant use.
Original post was in Chinese/Mandarin i just translated it.
 
No, all normal human can interact with wangling

Also some statement about transcend time and space or even their concept not outerverse level by default
 
No, all normal human can interact with wangling
You do know it's the whole premises of the shom him having average life with his lived ones by suppressing his all powers to now destroy everything by existing.
Also some statement about transcend time and space or even their concept not outerverse level by default
As a general rule-of-thumb, statements of being "above dimensions" and the like, whenever validly indicating a superiority over higher dimensions, fall under this tier without further context.
 
You do know it's the whole premises of the shom him having average life with his lived ones by suppressing his all powers to now destroy everything by existing.
Yeah, but still normal human can affect him. Outerverse cannot be like that

Yeah if it mean higher dimension, if it just stated dimension it mean nothing
 
Like fixxed said trancerding concept of dimensions will just depend on how many dimensions that exist in the verse, it needs context of being type 1 concept of dimensions that is the essence itself of dimensions to be able to encompass all possible dimensions
 
Last edited:
The dimensions used imply universes. Is there any more context to any of these? The translation looks garbage.

Edit: Is there something wrong with his profile? He has likely 2A rating but the reasoning is 2B.
 
Maybe it's high time i should make a cosmology page for verse for better understanding.
That would be High 3A no? And the scan says his body has only 80 trillion worlds.
Anyways no, a universe containing another universe inside it and that universe containing another universe inside it, and it goes on....
 
Then why not post that scan. It looks odd with the current scans.
Yeah like author straightforward saying we have the recursive universe in cosmology.
and you want everything thing straight up is what you saying?

You gotta connect the dots.

Anyways I will make a cosmology blog for verse once I am free with my exams next month.

If you can't understand the given scans then that's not my fault.
 
Yeah like author straightforward saying we have the recursive universe in cosmology.
and you want everything thing straight up is what you saying?

You gotta connect the dots.

Anyways I will make a cosmology blog for verse once I am free with my exams next month.

If you can't understand the given scans then that's not my fault.
Why are you so hostile for a question? The profile is to make things clearer for others not to make them connect dots. Nothing in the profile says that there is an infinite recursive Universe or that Wang Ling has anything like that. In fact, the profile explicitly says that he contains finite worlds:

The Matryoshka thing only has "layers with in layers and mountains beyond mountains" it doesn't even explain what the layer is supposed to be or any recursion of the Universe:
 
Why are you so hostile for a question? The profile is to make things clearer for others not to make them connect dots. Nothing in the profile says that there is an infinite recursive Universe or that Wang Ling has anything like that. In fact, the profile explicitly says that he contains finite worlds:

The Matryoshka thing only has "layers with in layers and mountains beyond mountains" it doesn't even explain what the layer is supposed to be or any recursion of the Universe:

Was not meant to be hostile, while you started saying the translation is garbage, originally there are only 10 main universe that has shown seperately while rest of them are resursion of those universe. Like you already seen in 2B scan 10k parallel dimensions, that is what a universe recursion happening, while we also have a type 3 multiverse too. Again this is also happening in a single universe due to recursive universe
 
Also reminding you, you are derailing my Q&A.
 
The very fact that one can interact with him shows that he caps at Low 1-A. 1-A would be disqualified.
 
Hmm. For now ig he is intractable tho that would still be in his sealed state. But even if you tried to interact with him forcefully it will be insta kill with just his aura.
 
Thats a leading question lol it cannot be used

Yeah ... Yeah just like you guys didn't say that in Yogiri's case when it was used. Anyways go on with your spite thread again
 
Yeah you're not allowed to use WoG info if it comes from leading questions like that
 
Back
Top