• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

TheMonkeMan said:
I mean tbf the dude is sort of being a condescending asshole, plus he said something like " Akainu went full [Ableist Slur] mode" which can easily hurt people with mental problems as it makes it sound like they're too stupid to even know how to dodge something which is clearly untruthful slander.
There's also stuff like him just disrupting threads with nonsense and not making a CRT to prove his claims despite being told so tens of times ( literally ), spamming Ant's wall with his personal feuds, etc.
Sure you can dismiss him as a troll, but if the norm is to ignore trolls and just move on to the next reports, then boy is this forum going to get shitty quick.

Edit: This is a thread where he goes back and forth with Reaper over his headcanon and ignores his requests to just make a damn CRT.
Click to expand...
I heard ignoring trolls actually makes the problem even worse because they’ll just become more aggressive and violent in their ways of getting attention and attacking others

(Aka don’t feed the trolls is actually not a good solution)

In other words best solution is to punish them or at least first find out why their acting like the way they are.

(Some trolls might just have issues communicating with others or just misunderstand things or etc, I’m not saying all trolls are like this but I’m saying that not every troll is someone who just wants to do horrible things online for the fun of it)
 
Antvasima said:
@DarkDragonMedeus @Celestial_Pegasus @Wokistan @Ultima_Reality @Mr._Bambu @Elizhaa @Qawsedf234 @ByAsura @Sir_Ovens @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @LordGriffin1000 @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Everything12 @Maverick_Zero_X

I would appreciate further staff input here.
Click to expand...
Enforcement of the site language guidelines isn't my wheelhouse, but I do agree that this general behavior should be addressed. If they have received several formal warnings before, then I would consider temporary bans on the table for discussion.
 
TheMonkeMan said:
I mean tbf the dude is sort of being a condescending asshole, plus he said something like " Akainu went full [Ableist Slur] mode" which can easily hurt people with mental problems as it makes it sound like they're too stupid to even know how to dodge something which is clearly untruthful slander.
There's also stuff like him just disrupting threads with nonsense and not making a CRT to prove his claims despite being told so tens of times ( literally ), spamming Ant's wall with his personal feuds, etc.
Sure you can dismiss him as a troll, but if the norm is to ignore trolls and just move on to the next reports, then boy is this forum going to get shitty quick.

Edit: This is a thread where he goes back and forth with Reaper over his headcanon and ignores his requests to just make a damn CRT.
Click to expand...
I... didn't say I wanted to dismiss him, lad. Trolls get banned.
 
TheMonkeMan said:
Also sorry to intervene but they're literally taking their arguments to Ant's wall, and he's being a tad aggressive and spamming stuff to goad Reaper into an argument as well as being weird and saying " I won't eat you ".
Click to expand...
Yeah, troll. I’m just going to ban him.

Propellus said:
But wait hold on, I wanted to know something for a sec, did 48 hours pass after the mods agreed to that before that was applied? Because those are the new rules now, if not, it should be reverted for now until those hours pass.
Click to expand...
They hadn’t, I’ve reverted the revisions until then.
 
I do think a ban for Gozan seems justified, he should have read the welcome message that links to various rules and some of those rules even have site rules against slur words in general. Plus the mass stonewalling and spamming Antvasima's wall does come off as trollish.
 
Bendynoah10 said:
oh sorry i was trying to make a profile out of boredom sorry if it caused any trouble i didn't even know it was public i thought it was only available to me
Click to expand...
If you want to work on pages without publishing on the main wiki, use a sandbox. You can do this by going to your wiki page, and adding a /, then something else beyond it. It'll create a subpage where you can work freely.

For example, I have https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Crabwhale/Sandbox and https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Crabwhale/Gravelbox, but you can essentially substitute any word you like (or even symbols, letters, etc) to make your own.
 
Maverick_Zero_X said:
Multiple people seemed to conclude he was just a troll so I figured he wasn't worth having around. But if that was a misread I'm fine with a shorter ban period.
Click to expand...
Damage3245 said:
I'm fine with a three month ban period for them instead.
Click to expand...
Is a three months ban for Gozan2222 acceptable to the rest of you as well?
 
Crabwhale said:
If you want to work on pages without publishing on the main wiki, use a sandbox. You can do this by going to your wiki page, and adding a /, then something else beyond it. It'll create a subpage where you can work freely.

For example, I have https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Crabwhale/Sandbox and https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User:Crabwhale/Gravelbox, but you can essentially substitute any word you like (or even symbols, letters, etc) to make your own.
Click to expand...
thank you
 
Antvasima said:
@DaReaperMan mentioned that he thinks that permanently banning @Gozan2222 seems to have been an overreaction.


What do you think, @Mr._Bambu and @Maverick_Zero_X ?
Click to expand...
He may have acted trollish, but at the same time he was also new and acted like he was possibly not old enough to understand. I think a 3 month ban seems like a better solution in which we can ban them for much longer if they come back to do the same thing.
 
@TheGreatMaster12 is harassing Firestorm on his wall again.

He was banned before for doing this sort of thing, and was lifted early when he apologized. But he was later rude to people who believed in Doomslayer's Low 1-C upgrade, and of course back to the square 1 that got him banned in the first place. It seems like a longer ban than his old 3 month block might be warranted at this point. I think 6 months this time might do more justice.
 
Quick question. If someone wants to downgrade a verse in spite of fun, or "for the lols".....how long is the ban time, and would that invalidate the CRT?. ̶ ̶(̶O̶b̶v̶ ̶I̶ ̶h̶a̶v̶e̶ ̶s̶c̶r̶e̶e̶n̶s̶h̶o̶t̶s̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶b̶a̶c̶k̶ ̶u̶p̶ ̶m̶y̶ ̶c̶l̶a̶i̶m̶)̶

Becouse I think there are rules against this, IIRC I remember KLOL told this to a user a few weeks ago.
 
Last edited:
If the downgrades are valid, their reasons for doing it aren't really important.

Basically it's only a rule violation if the downgrades both are extremely weak in basis, and comes from a place of spitefulness.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
If the downgrades are valid, their reasons for doing it aren't really important.

Basically it's only a rule violation if the downgrades both are extremely weak in basis, and comes from a place of spitefulness.
Click to expand...
I mean, I remember it was said that's report worthy entirely, even if reasons are valid. And it should be, regardless. That's entirely out of spitefulness.

Anyways, thanks for the reply.
 
Last edited:
DarkDragonMedeus said:
He may have acted trollish, but at the same time he was also new and acted like he was possibly not old enough to understand. I think a 3 month ban seems like a better solution in which we can ban them for much longer if they come back to do the same thing.
Click to expand...
Mr._Bambu said:
I had thought action was already taken. Three months seems like a lot but I would call it the upper bounds of what I think is acceptable in this case.
Click to expand...
I adjusted his ban to three months instead of permanent.
 
Mr._Bambu said:
If the downgrades are valid, their reasons for doing it aren't really important.

Basically it's only a rule violation if the downgrades both are extremely weak in basis, and comes from a place of spitefulness.
Click to expand...
Well, honest logical arguments are fine, but arguing in genuine bad faith is not.
 
DarkDragonMedeus said:
@TheGreatMaster12 is harassing Firestorm on his wall again.

He was banned before for doing this sort of thing, and was lifted early when he apologized. But he was later rude to people who believed in Doomslayer's Low 1-C upgrade, and of course back to the square 1 that got him banned in the first place. It seems like a longer ban than his old 3 month block might be warranted at this point. I think 6 months this time might do more justice.
Click to expand...
Firestorm808 said:
To clarify, we had previously given a verbal warning for off-topic grievances back in January.

Click to expand...
Well, the harrassment is clearly unacceptable, and the last quoted link above was only worthy of a warning at the time, yes, but since he received a 3 months block previously, and that was apparently removed due to him apologising to Firestorm808, would a new 3 months block be appropriate currently?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
StarShooter80
Establishing Gap Needed for LS Stomps
Replies
13
Views
841
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Agnaa
  • Locked
Controversial Powers on New Pages - Editing Rules Tweak
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top