• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
910516-middle.png


I'm sorry, what?
This is the face the moon made when it felt Saitama's hand before the Flip
 
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/566830605782876170/994262491272069140/unknown.png

The attack is literally labeled "Serious Punch Squared". The implication being that the clash of two Serious Punches produced an impact exponentially bigger than just one Serious Punch.

It's like when two Mjolnirs clash in Marvel Comics.
That’s the title.
 
We're not going to do that.

You need hard evidence to apply such a massive size rating and there's nothing currently for that. For now the feat is 4-A.
What? Zamasu's calc was 3-C+, and all he said was that he had an idea.

If the logic and math of those 'ideas' check out, I see no reason why we can't use them. You can't just bind a feat to a rating you came up with in your head. That's not how it works.
 
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/566830605782876170/994262491272069140/unknown.png

The attack is literally labeled "Serious Punch Squared". The implication being that the clash of two Serious Punches produced an impact exponentially bigger than just one Serious Punch.

It's like when two Mjolnirs clash in Marvel Comics.
naming fallacy
 
If I remember correctly, beams do get massive results compared to omni-directional blasts. Like destroying the universe with a beam is 30x higher from a massively low-balled calc.
 
Don't forget that it takes million years for light to reach the earth,if there is something that blocked the light from 1 light years for one minute,the space will completely black for one minute,in one year.
The blow was so strong it annihilated light itself!
 
We're not going to do that.

You need hard evidence to apply such a massive size rating and there's nothing currently for that. For now the feat is 4-A.
I will use simple math. And to refute it in context or accept it is not my business.
 
If I remember correctly, beams do get massive results compared to omni-directional blasts. Like destroying the universe with a beam is 30x higher from a massively low-balled calc.
Yeah. It could be higher. This is a difficult calculation to do.

The diameter of the cylinder is given to us, and we can use the distance between galaxies as the height/length.

Not sure what the formula would be for it, though.
 
I still disagree on the galaxy stuff, but I'll keep trying to find that beam formula.
 
It seems that Garou is relying more and more on the Saitama Mode, his new and old techniques, amplified and combined by his power are all being useless against Saitama, so in the last few panels, it seems he is going to try again and copy his enemy's strength in a desperate attempt to match up with him.

That might eventually have a negative effect on him...

Perhaps, he might go bald?
 
I still disagree on the galaxy stuff, but I'll keep trying to find that beam formula.
I mean even the human eye can see the Andromeda galaxy in the night sky in certain regions of Earth.
 
I doubt garous gonna recreate the big bang since it would 100% literally kill everyone unless its done in some pocket dimension. Only two things i could see happening is some observable universe splitting or some time shattering.
 
I mean even the human eye can see the Andromeda galaxy in the night sky in certain regions of Earth.
Yes, I know that, but it can also do the opposite as I demonstrated.

I'm not saying it doesn't work as a mid-end and/or high-end, though.
 
Back
Top