• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
That's not how it works.
yes, this is how it works.
using all of your energy to be just 2 times stronger than your enemy, and you have only one shot that can be avoided, tanked
meanwhile your enemy will easily regenerate and finish you
 
Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying. Look at their pages 💀

Y'all OPM fans disappoint me, why you still holding on to Boros, like he's the only top tier in the verse? That dude has been out-scaled since Psychos-Orochi fought Tatsumaki. And please, stop taking narrator's statements out of context.
narrative never implied boros to be that strong
every mention about boros was him talking about himself being EXTREMALY cocky.
 
yes, this is how it works.
using all of your energy to be just 2 times stronger than your enemy, and you have only one shot that can be avoided, tanked
meanwhile your enemy will easily regenerate and finish you
I'm not debating against Tatsumaki > Boros because I honestly couldn't care less. I'm arguing that the CSRC, which is 11 exatons, is above Tatsumaki, who is unquantifiable above 5 exatons. She's above by a huge amount, but its not enough to put her above CSRC's 11 exatons.
 
just because her feat is as impressive visualy as orochi's gaia cannon, does not mean that she's weaker, theres alot of evidences of psykorochi being much stronger.
 
Saitama tanked and matched Consecutive Normal Punches, Tanked Nuclear Fission Punch, Tanked Gamma Ray Burst, and more. Try again.

Blast being able to keep up is a speed feat, not an AP or Durability feat.

Blast never bested Garou. He caught him off guard, and capitalized on that to BFR Garou, but still did no damage. Try again.

Which is why we need to keep an unknown rating for Blast: Because it's unknown whether he damaged Garou or not. Try again.
- How does that stop Saitama from not scaling to Garou due to the fact that no visible damage was shown on Garou? What an irrelevant point this is 💀

- Blast being able to keep up is both AP and speed feat. He clearly knocked Garou clean and some crust things, like his exoskeleton broke or some thing.

- You: Blast never bested Garou.

You: He caught Garou off-guard and capitalized on that.

Lmfao, can you not counter your own points?

- Blast would be at least 5-A for easily keeping up with Garou, and besting him.
 
I'm not debating against Tatsumaki > Boros because I honestly couldn't care less. I'm arguing that the CSRC, which is 11 exatons, is above Tatsumaki, who is unquantifiable above 5 exatons. She's above by a huge amount, but its not enough to put her above CSRC's 11 exatons.
i'm not saying that she's above 11 exatons, i'm saying that she can tank it and then finish boros after this lol.
being 2 times stronger is not even close enough to hitkill you.
 
in 2 shots psykorochi can literally do as much damage that boros does with CSRC that uses ALL OF HIS ENERGY.
and we're talking about PO, not tatsumaki.
 
- How does that stop Saitama from not scaling to Garou due to the fact that no visible damage was shown on Garou? What an irrelevant point this is 💀
You tried to use my "no visible damage" point to say that Saitama won't scale to Garou, when that's not true. Saitama has a multitude of different feats to scale to Garou.
- Blast being able to keep up is both AP and speed feat. He clearly knocked Garou clean and some crust things, like his exoskeleton broke or some thing.
Those "crust things" are specks that fly off of Gravity Knuckle. We've been through this in the last couple pages multiple times. Reread the chapter.
Blast being able to keep up is both AP and speed feat.
How is "keeping up" an AP feat?

- You: Blast never bested Garou.

You: He caught Garou off-guard and capitalized on that.
He never bested Garou in a head on confrontation. When he tried, his portals got overwhelmed from Garou's sheer energy.
- Blast would be at least 5-A for easily keeping up with Garou, and besting him.
He would be 5-A if he damaged Garou, took attacks with little effort, or clashed with him- none of which he did. Try again.
 
This feat is way stronger
5f4bdb13001f14385d84110a342c5360.jpg

Than this one
f159c7efff7535737b2076f744d8ed18.jpg

You are stupid if you disagree 😎
 
You tried to use my "no visible damage" point to say that Saitama won't scale to Garou, when that's not true. Saitama has a multitude of different feats to scale to Garou.

Those "crust things" are specks that fly off of Gravity Knuckle. We've been through this in the last couple pages multiple times. Reread the chapter.

How is "keeping up" an AP feat?


He never bested Garou in a head on confrontation. When he tried, his portals got overwhelmed from Garou's sheer energy.

He would be 5-A if he damaged Garou, took attacks with little effort, or clashed with him- none of which he did. Try again.
- What exactly is not true? This man twisting words now. With your absurd logic, Saitama's AP will not scale to Garou for shit.he never made any visible damage on Garou, show me one he did right now. These feats you speak of are just Saitama's resistances and durability to Garou's attacks, his AP feats will not scale following your logic.

- No, those specs are Garou's exoskeleton 💀

- Blast was able to beat Garou so bast Garou to the point where he was throwing multiple barrages at him. I believe if Blast's attack were not working, it would have been states clearly... You're concluding based on a headcanon that no visible damage was done despite Garou getting best up + the fact that you can't even tell if Garou's taking damage or not. The only things we've got going for us is the sheer fact that Blast could keep up, and best my guy multiple times, and even broke his exoskeleton seemingly.

- He literally fought Garou head on, what are you smoking my guy? You're using that one time Blast speed blitzed Garou from behind as some kind of a stance against Blast fighting Garou head on? 💀 Blast literally took all of Garou's attacks, kept up and opened up multiple portals to BFR his attacks.

- He damaged Garou, he clashed with Garou but didn't damage Garou and clash with Garou 😹😹😹😹😹
 
Dudes out here actually trying to deny Blast his feats.

What a joke 😆
i think that the problem is that: blast's hax has nothing to do with durability or AP, so it's not that easy to scale him to garou.
but i'm sure that blast scales.
 
- What exactly is not true? This man twisting words now. With your absurd logic, Saitama's AP will not scale to Garou for shit.he never made any visible damage on Garou, show me one he did right now. These feats you speak of are just Saitama's resistances and durability to Garou's attacks, his AP feats will not scale following your logic.
I can't tell if you're purposefully being ignorant for the sake of your argument, or you really just don't understand basic logic and haven't read the manga. If it's the latter, here is what I'm saying:

The example you used of Saitama is False Equivalence Fallacy. Saitama does not need to show visible damage to Garou due to him tanking many of Garou's attacks with ease. If you still don't get it after this, I will stop replying to you.
- No, those specs are Garou's exoskeleton 💀
What ******* exoskeleton? Are we reading the same manga?

- Blast was able to beat Garou so bast Garou to the point where he was throwing multiple barrages at him. I believe if Blast's attack were not working, it would have been states clearly... You're concluding based on a headcanon that no visible damage was done despite Garou getting best up + the fact that you can't even tell if Garou's taking damage or not. The only things we've got going for us is the sheer fact that Blast could keep up, and best my guy multiple times, and even broke his exoskeleton seemingly.
Blast hit Garou right after Garou popped out of the portal. Garou had no way of reacting. Blast kept following up with attacks, until he BFR'd Garou. Blast did not do damage. He was knocking him back, just as Half Monster Garou was knocking back Darkshine without doing damage prior to his Spiral evolution.
- He literally fought Garou head on, what are you smoking my guy? You're using that one time Blast speed blitzed Garou from behind as some kind of a stance against Blast fighting Garou head on? 💀 Blast literally took all of Garou's attacks, kept up and opened up multiple portals to BFR his attacks.
The only time he fought head on without catching him off guard was here. That is a speed feat and BFR, not an AP or Durability feat. This is probably the 6th time I've had to explain this today. I'm tired of it.
- He damaged Garou, he clashed with Garou but didn't damage Garou and clash with Garou 😹😹😹😹😹
Never damaged Garou
Never clashed with Garou

Dudes out here actually trying to deny Blast his feats.
Dudes out here want to jump to giving someone 5-A when they have 0 clear AP or durability feats, even though theres an 'unknown' rating deliberately for a case like this.
 
Back
Top