Rank is also a measure of popularity. Even a B-Class character can canonically have higher stats than A-class characters as shown by that one monster who scanned them (and civilian martial artists stronger than A-Class characters exist).
Firstly, this is the system we currently use for scaling them to Saitama, so it'd still need to change.
Secondly, we can use their own feats and scaling, then, just not Saitama's. It still needs to change.
Lastly, your point about civilian martial artists doesn't really have any relevancy because they're not in the position to even be ranked.
Scaling to Saitama is bad because there was no direct correlation for us to compare his stats to the host of characters currently scaled to him and it is also contradictory since, once, even Atomic Samurai's apprentices had to ask him how to deal with bullets (though this is likely PIS). Being A-Class or whatever is irrelevant.
Cool, but I'm the one suggesting we get rid of Saitama scaling instead of keeping it. So I don't see how this relates to my point.
They demonstrated far higher speed than the bullets in the chapter and currently scale much higher even in their first keys, so it's not even a contradiction or PIS.
Not really. Plenty of A-Class have shown parity with speed in combat, like Stinger and Lightning Genji, Lightning Max and Snek, etc. All we need to do is remove Saitama's feats, find the ones that scale, and find new feats for the ones that don't (a lot of them already have their own feats on the profiles already).
Saving yourself time by noting down what we deem canon once in a note will always be better time management than wasting the time explaining something that has been brought up in a dozen other threads.
What threads? I've found 4 or so over the past few months (including this one), and they're all quickly curbed. Most of the arguments to begin with weren't even using the anime feats, they were arguments that the anime should be canon.
Also, in all the threads the issues have been brought up no one has addressed them once either due to a lack of interest in a lack of time so no, you or almost anyone else will probably not have the time to do this.
Firstly, what threads (aside from this one, supposedly)?
Secondly, I completely re-edited that point.
'I don't see why that's the case for the webcomic, which isn't even used for feats due to the anime and manga simply having better art, feats and statements.'
Feats and scaling, yes, but in relation to their canon. Which my note was addressing (and included the anime). Even responding to this conversation topic without taking that into consideration doesn't even make sense to be honest.
You didn't say that, you said we shouldn't use the manga ratings because the webcomic is the original. This is exclusively what I'm referring to.
'The point is since the WC is the original canon it should have been used for feats and scaling, and not Murata's manga, or at least not without a note differentiating the two. Thank you for attempting to clarify though.'
And no, no one is asking you to release the profiles before you're ready. It will also only solve a part of the problem since it doesn't address the anime.
You missed this edit.
'Also, while keep the anime separate, we do use its depiction of feats for the manga in many cases.'
Anyway, I suppose the note is fine with a few alterations, and I'm done arguing about it. Just make a CRT or something.